Racist Democrats in the House of Representatives are calling for impeachment hearings against Hispanic Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Alberto Gonzales has been targeted by racist Democrats intent on doing anything possible to destroy a Hispanic man.

Gonzales has been intensely grilled in recent months over completely legal activity. He has been harassed by Democrats over everything from the completely legal firing of US attorneys to the probable cause monitoring of terrorists’ communications.

The DFLers are claiming that Gonzales made inconsistent statements during interrogation. Democrats exploited cultural differences in an attempt to trip-up Gonzales during questioning. Now the Democrats are using these “inconsistencies” in a pathetic, racist attempt to destroy an innocent Hispanic man.

This is just the latest attempt by the Democrats to destroy the Bush administration and weaken the United States by making it easier for terrorists to commit acts of war against innocent civilians. Democrats are abusing their power to attack a Hispanic man because they see this member of a minority group as the easiest target in their sickening campaign against all that is good and right.

Democrats are showing their true colors by harassing an innocent Latino man.

(Article)

The only difference between a Democrat and a thief is that a thief is much more efficient at stealing your money.

The catfight between Hillary Clinton’s camp and the Barack Obama camp continues.

The origin of this typical Democrat silliness is the Youtube debate from a few nights ago where Barack Obama said that he would be willing to pander to leaders of hostile nations by meeting with them.

The Clinton camp is saying that Obama is naive for his willingness to meet with rogue leaders. The Obama camp snorted back that Hillary Clinton would maintain the Bush status quo with regard to international diplomacy.

John Edwards, meanwhile, is demonstrating his self-serving nature by using this spat to his advantage. Edwards said:

If you’re looking for what’s wrong in Washington, why the system is broken, one perfect example is what’s been happening over the last four days. We’ve had two good people, Democratic candidates for president, who’ve spent their time attacking each other instead of attacking the problems facing our country.

Perhaps these DFLers should get back to their master plan for America: the confiscation of more wealth from hardworking Americans and complete pandering to terrorists, life-long welfare recipients, and convicted felons.

(Article)

The US economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.4% during the second quarter of 2007.

Wall Street Journal Article

That’s good, solid growth. It’s not too high, not too low, it’s just right.

Keep in mind: Democrats have been fighting to take money out of the economy via tax increases since 2001.

If the Democrats had gotten their way, our economy would not be as strong as it is. Millions of jobs that are held by American workers today would not exist. Thanks to President Bush and the Republicans–and no thanks to the Democrats–our nation’s unemployment rate is at a record low.

Our economy is 70% driven by consumers. If the Democrats take money out of the pockets of consumers by raising taxes, that is money that will not be spent to drive the economy and job growth. Does that make sense? Well, it doesn’t to the Democrats or their dim-witted voters.

Hillary Clinton is promising to raise taxes. So is John Edwards. So is Barack Obama. As a matter of fact, every Democrat is promising to raise taxes. They are promising to take money out of the economy and kill economic growth! Millions of American workers will be hurt by the Democratic Party if they get what they want!

If you have any sense at all you will reject the Democratic Party and their socialist ideals.

The Democratic Party: Bad for workers, bad for America.

Everywhere you look, the Democratic Party and their allies are destroying something. Destroying cities with crime and violence, destroying schools with misbehavior and low intelligence, destroying industries, and if they had their way, entire economies.

Now, the United Auto Workers Union is hellbent on destroying itself.

Despite the auto industry being in severe financial straits due to ridiculously high wages and life-long benefits, the United Auto Workers Union is “not in the mood” to offer concessions.

UAW membership peaked in 1979 at 1.5 million members, stands at 538,000 today, and could drop to around 400,000 in a couple of years if business conditions do not change.

Auto workers make about $30 doing a job a trained monkey could do. Plus, they get generous health benefits and a life-long pension once they hit the 30-year mark. They are grossly over-compensated for what they do.

If the UAW and its members agreed to give up their pensions, which they do not deserve in the first place, that would go a long way to making the American automotive industry profitable again. It might even spare a hundred-thousand union jobs or more.

But the UAW will never give up its pensions. Why? Because pensions are the ultimate way to “stick it to the man”. Pensions are payments for doing nothing. You don’t work, you still get paid.

What better way for an anti-capitalist Democrat ally to “stick it to the man” than insist on getting paid for nothing?

Almost every unionized industry in America has been on the brink of destruction. The steel, airline, grocery, and automotive industries just to name a few. They’ve all been on the brink of destruction for the same reason: union stubbornness in adapting to a changing world economy.

There is something seriously wrong with the brains of Democrats. Logic is lacking, for sure. But there is something else, something so destructive inside that it results in the destruction of the self to spite another party.

The American economy will be much more efficient and better positioned to compete in the global economy once these unions are stamped out. Let’s hope these unions bleed to death quickly after they slit their own throats!

(Bloomberg Article)

It seems that some scientists are starting to believe that crops can alter the weather. Oh, really? I thought scientists knew everything there is to know about the environment. Al Gore sure acts like everything is known for certain, right down to telling us how to live our lives (while he pollutes and pollutes and pollutes and makes tons of money).

This whole global warming nonsense is a liberal hoax intended to provide yet another excuse for liberals to raise our taxes and control our lives.

Selected passages from the article:

Climatologists are beginning to build evidence that agricultural crops, and particularly corn, are driving up dew points as they sweat buckets of water into the atmosphere. They also may make corn-growing areas cooler and alter rain patterns.

Some also say the extra moisture could add energy to thunderstorms.

By “transpiring” more heavily than the prairie grasses that preceded them, and in relatively short periods, crops can generate air movements that can lead to storms, and intensify the season during which water is cycled through the atmosphere.

I guess in addition to reducing energy use, we should stop planting crops to avert “environmental catastrophe”? Or is this a situation where only rich liberals like Al Gore and Hillary Clinton can eat?

Here’s some news from Democrat-voting cities across America. This kind of stuff is an everyday occurrence in Democratland. This is very rare in Republican-voting communities.

Chicago, IL: A 21-year-old woman was fatally shot in the head while sitting in a car.

Grand Rapids, MI: A 15-year-old boy and 13-year-old girl were shot and wounded in a drive-by shooting.

Philadelphia, PA: Three people murdered in a bar shooting.

Annapolis, MD: A member of the Democrats’ most loyal voting base walks up to a group of people and murders a man.

Oakland, CA: A man was shot and his female passenger killed while driving down Martin Luther King Junior Way.

Crime in these communities wasn’t this bad until Democrats cemented control. In fact, you can trace the rise of societal destruction in these cities to the time when they had their last Republican mayors. Right after they had their last Republican mayors crime skyrocketed.

I could go on and on with these news stories–but I don’t have the time! There is so much senseless crime and violence in Democrat-voting strongholds it is hard to imagine what it must be like to live in such conditions. Republican communities, by contrast, are mostly peaceful and prosperous–low crime, low violence, and murder is a rarity.

Hey, you want to know a secret? The majority of these shootings are committed by blacks and to a lesser extent by Hispanics. Both groups are loyal DFL voters. So don’t expect the DFL to do anything to stop this senseless murder and violence. Democrats don’t want to offend their most loyal voting blocs.

You see, being such colossal frauds and phonies, Democrats are more concerned about offending people than they are about innocent people being senselessly murdered. It’s about appearances and votes with the DFL.

The Democratic Party has a 40-plus year track record of destroying communities. Yet people are still dumb enough to vote for the DFL. Why?

The Democratic Party: Destroying America one community at a time.

Liberal environmental groups have sued Royal Dutch Shell and have succeeded in temporarily halting oil drilling in the Alaskan arctic.

Every time an oil company wants to drill for oil or some oil company or investment group wants to build a refinery, liberals file lawsuits to try and stop it.

Wonder why gas prices are so high? Liberals and their Democrat allies are to blame.

(Article)

The Democratic Party has blocked domestic oil drilling every year since 2001. As long as the dirty Democrats have enough members in Congress to block drilling for domestic oil, you can expect gas prices to continue to rise.

As with almost everything bad that happens to America, you can lay the blame at the Democrats’ feet.

Democrats are shameless panderers, aren’t they? They’ve got no pride, no dignity, nothing–just bullshit and meaningless platitudes.

Barack Obama groveled before union members today (or will…), promising that he’ll stand beside them if he is elected president. Obama spewed more mental poison–the typical Democrat tripe: inequality, everybody is out to get you, I’m the only one who can save you, yada yada yada.

Let’s look at some of Barack Obama’s “genius”, shall we?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070721/ap_on_el_pr/obama_labor

We are facing a Washington that has thrown open its doors to the most anti-union, anti-worker forces we’ve seen in generations…

Despite record low unemployment, rising exports, and rising worker incomes, evil Georgie Bush be out to get you.

What we need to make real today is the idea that in this country we value the labor of every American.

Only I, Barack Obama, can give you strength for you are weak and powerless and incapable of being anything other than a peon on your own. You cannot live without me!

I stood on the picket line and marched with workers at the Congress Hotel in Chicago last week. I had marched with them four years earlier and I told them when I left that if they were still fighting four years from now, I’d be back on that picket line as president of the United States.

I stand beside you, lowly scum. Be thankful you have me because without me, Barack Obama, you are nothing!

When I talk about hope, when I talk about change, when I talk about holding America up to its ideals of opportunity and equality, this isn’t just the rhetoric of a campaign for me, it’s been the cause of a life — a cause I will work for and fight for every day as your president.

I will make sure equality exists…by taking all of your money and giving it to someone else! Only I can tell you what equality is and is not. I am your savior, your messiah, I am Barack Obama the Great!

Vote for me and I will make sure that your jobs are safe–by raising taxes so high as to make American production unprofitable and unrewarding. Then, you’ll really need me as your jobs fly overseas so fast all you’ll see is a blur.

Hmmm, I wonder what Barack Obama has to offer to intelligent, successful people. Oh, I already know: absolutely nothing but more wealth confiscation.

Yeah, I think I’ll support Barack Obama so he can steal more of what I’ve worked so hard for…

Intelligent, hard-working Americans have absolutely no use for the Democratic Party; the DFL is only a barrier to achieving your dreams.

It seems that DFL presidential candidate John Edwards has misplaced his testicles. Has anyone seen them???

http://www.startribune.com/587/story/1313880.html

You’ve just got to laugh when it is the woman who is the strong one in the family and the husband is the weak one. Talk about role-reversal. John Edwards dispatches his wife to do the things he should be doing.

It doesn’t matter. John Edwards is toast. Nobody in their right mind could support such a blatant fraud and hypocrite. But then again, we are talking about Democrat voters… They tend to support anyone who promises more welfare freebies regardless of the true economic cost.

The Pentagon has harshly criticized Hillary Clinton for helping the terrorists with her “abandon Iraq” public statements. From the MSNBC article:

Premature and public discussion of the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq reinforces enemy propaganda that the United States will abandon its allies in Iraq, much as we are perceived to have done in Vietnam, Lebanon and Somalia…

Well, that’s a no-brainer. Unless you are a liberal, in which case you don’t have much of a brain in the first place.

Also on the same page is a link to MSNBC video where Hillary Clinton demonstrates what a fraud she is with respect to her position on the Iraq War. In March, Hillary said she would pull troops out of Iraq. Then this month she said she would leave American troops behind in Iraq to train Iraqi security forces and help keep the peace.

Uh, which is it, Ms. Clinton? You can’t have it both ways! Democrats, being pathological frauds and liars, always play both sides of an issue. They need to appeal to their delusional and highly vocal liberal base while at the same time keeping one foot rooted in reality to avoid scaring off the portion of the Democratic base that has a modicum of common sense.

Hillary must have been taking lessons from her husband Bill Clinton on how to be two-faced. Perhaps Hillary should take some lessons from Monica Lewinsky. Maybe then Bill Clinton will actually stop by to see her for more than a photo opportunity.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are an idiot.

Former CIA employee Valerie Plame, who was completely legally discussed with a reporter, had her lawsuit against innocent members of the Bush administration dismissed by a federal judge today.

Plame claimed she was a covert operative, but really wasn’t. Well, nobody knows if she was covert or not. Given that she’s a Democrat, and Democrats tend to lie frequently, who can really believe her? Since she worked at the CIA headquarters and walked in the front door everyday, odds are she wasn’t covert.

But that didn’t stop the Democrat spin machine from making all sorts of defamatory claims against the Bush administration, which didn’t have anything to do with the “leaking” of Plame’s name. It was Richard Armitage, former Deputy Secretary of State, who first discussed Plame with a reporter. You may not know that, since the network news tends to not report factual information like that. I wonder if Charlie Gibson will mention that on the news tonight…

(Story)

Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards has slipped in a recent poll of New Hampshire voters. Edwards had a dismal 9% support of voters, compared to 14% in June.

Further, 24% of Democrat respondents said they would not vote for Edwards.

Edwards is toast!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/18/nh.poll/index.html

Maybe Edwards could boost his popularity by finding a new, more expensive hair stylist.

Under threat of presidential veto, a Senate committee approved a $35 billion expansion of a children’s health insurance program.

Why can’t the parents of these children pay for health insurance for their own kids? Assuming the parents are able-bodied (most are) and assuming the children don’t have chronic diseases not coverable under existing health insurance plans (most don’t), insurance wouldn’t cost that much. A 30-year-old man can get a health insurance policy on ehealthinsurance.com with a $10,000 deductible and 0% coinsurance for less than $70 per month, so I can’t imagine a child’s health insurance costing much more.

Unfortunately, this is supported by Republicans as well. Republicans are looking more like free-spending Democrats with each passing day. The cost of this bill, supposedly, is going to be paid for by tax increases on tobacco products. Unfortunately, less and less people are smoking all the time. So in a few years there probably won’t be enough smokers to pay for this program (a pack of cigarettes costs $4 a pack where I am now–I do not smoke).

This is the deal with the Democrats: they are trying to create a responsibility-free society with everything paid for by a third-party. And Republicans, more and more, are jumping on bandwagon.

How about this: pass a “parental responsibility act” which makes parents legally responsible for the upbringing and financial support of their own children instead of dumping more and more parenting responsibility onto the taxpayers!

Sorry, but if you are an able-bodied adult and are unwilling to get a job to pay for your own child’s health insurance, you are a piece of crap. And there is no shortage of crap voting for the DFL. Just check the public housing projects. Or check out how many kids receive free school meals in Democrat-voting strongholds (often 70% of all school kids or higher). Democrats love their own children so much they can’t be bothered to feed them.

I was just perusing the advertising rates of some liberal nutjob blogs this morning and it really amazed me as to what shameless, money-grubbing slimeballs these left-wingers are. These people are enriching themselves with lies and conspiracy theories and laughing all the way to the bank.

Liberals advocate stealing money from people who earn it at every turn. They criticize the rich, demonize them, and accuse them of all sorts of hypothetical corruption from raping the working class to keeping this person or that group down. They criticize oil companies for making huge profits. They criticize the high cost of food, housing, medical care, and pretty much everything in our capitalistic system. But when it comes down to it, liberals are trying to make as much money–for themselves–as they possibly can. And they are doing it while attempting to tear down the very system that allows them to make so much money. (Hypocritical? You bet. But, it is just one example of how irrational liberals truly are.)

Liberal money-makers must laugh at the gullible fools they make their money from.

Let’s take a look at some advertising rates on liberal/socialist/rich-people-suck blogs:

Talking Points Memo: $10,000 per week for premium ad, less for other page locations

DailyKos: $9,000 per week for a standard first-slot ad, less for ads further down on the page

The Raw Story: $8,000 per week for top-left spot, less for other page locations

Crooks And Liars: $1,995 per week for a standard ad, $4,600 for a one-week high-rise ad

As you can clearly see, liberal bloggers are money-grubbing frauds. They make a ton of money for telling people that you and I shouldn’t be able to keep the money we earn.

Whether it is Al Gore polluting like crazy flying all over the world in private jets to make money from speaking engagements, Barbara Streisand charging $450 for a concert ticket while criticizing Republicans for not helping the poor, Michael Moore charging $40,000 to tell poor college kids about the horrors of rich people, John Edwards charging $55,000 to talk about poverty for an hour, or Al Franken demanding a $2 million annual salary for a radio show nobody listens to, each and every single liberal on this planet is a fraud.

This leads me to one question: how stupid must you be to be a liberal?

Oprah Winfrey is going to host a big-money fundraiser for Illinois Senator Barack Obama at her Santa Barbara, CA, mansion in September. The minimum price to get in is $2,300; if you can bring $50,000 in funds, you can stay for dinner.

So much for the Democrats being for the “poor and downtrodden”, huh? The fact is Democrats pander to the underclass because they need the votes to get elected. But Democrat elites shut out those poor, unclean Democrat voters every chance they get. The poor are nothing more than pawns in the big-money DFL machine.

All these Democrats are frauds. Barack Obama is nothing more than a whore to big money–Big Hollywood money, in particular. Obama will be happy to shuck ‘n’ jive for you, if you’ve got the money to donate, that is. And Oprah, you remember how she cried about racism because a store in France wouldn’t let her in after hours? She’s a crybaby fraud. Enough said about Oprah.

The entertainment industry is full of phonies. They are people who earn their livings pretending to be something they are not. So it isn’t surprising that this fraud carries over to their everyday lives. Their devotion to Barack Obama is puzzling to many. Obama is as lacking in substance as one can possibly get. He gives flowery speeches that appeal to unthinking idiots. But he never elaborates on how he is going to implement–or pay for–his massive social programs. Obama is style over substance, which is why he appeals to Big Hollywood frauds. Obama is an empty suit if ever there was one.

Oprah Winfrey is an uppity Oreo. She doesn’t want anything to do with her black brethren. She surely isn’t going to invite black ghetto dwellers to her fancy mansion, is she? No, of course not.

There may be some black faces at Oprah’s fundraiser. But they’ll be bussing tables and sweeping the floor.

By the way, how much “global warming” causing carbon dioxide is going to be emitted into the atmosphere by Oprah and her rich buddies in the course of this unnecessary fundraiser?

Yes, all these Democrats are dirty frauds and liars. Each and every one. You see, these wealthy Democrats are entitled to their money and have the right to pollute at massive levels. But you and I, the lowly working stiffs, we don’t. We must live our lives the way they tell us. Just ask Al Gore.

Democrat presidential contender John Edwards started a multi-state poverty tour a couple of days ago to shine a spotlight on poverty in America. Edwards is going to regale the impoverished with his $1,250 haircut.

Unbelievable! It’s unbelievable that any thinking human being can support a man who is such a blatant fraud and hypocrite. Every single time that I think a Democrat can’t sink any lower in the fraud and hypocrisy department, one exceeds my wildest expectations.

Judge a man not by his words, but by his deeds. OK, let’s judge John Edwards:

• He got rich by filing frivolous lawsuits against doctors
• He lives a lavish lifestyle of wealth and luxury, indulging his expensive tastes every chance he gets whether it is his 28,000 square foot mansion or $1,250 haircuts
• He says he cares about the poor, but doesn’t use his own riches to assist the impoverished

The verdict: John Edwards is a disgusting fraud and hypocrite.

John Edwards has reported assets of $30 million. He made $480,000 from a part-time job at a hedge fund (I didn’t know ambulance-chasing lawyers were financial experts). He also made $400,000 from giving speeches, mostly to college kids. (Recall that Edwards charged poor college kids $55,000 to give a speech about poverty. “Hey poor college kids: pay me, an already-rich Democrat, $55,000 and I’ll tell you about poverty for an hour!” )

Let’s say Edwards woke up one morning and decided that he was tired of being a hypocrite. Let’s say he decided to give the bulk of his wealth away to the poor. If he kept $2 million for himself, he could invest that in some high-quality corporate bonds and generate a pre-tax annual income of $100,000—enough for any family to live on and more than the majority of American families earn. Then he could donate $28 million to aid the poor he pretends to care so much about. If you assume a construction cost of $75,000 per housing unit for modest housing, enough units could be built with Edwards’ money to house over 370 impoverished families!!!

Don’t worry, Edwards will never use his own money to help the poor. Why not? Because he is a fraud, that’s why! He preaches one thing, and lives his life the exact opposite. Two Americas, Mr. Edwards? Which one are you living in? And in your world is everyone blind to your hypocrisy? Because in the real world we aren’t.

Forty-plus years of the War On Poverty has failed. Trillions of dollars have been stolen from those who earn it and given to those too lazy to earn it. What makes Edwards think that more of the same is going to do the trick?

Democrats never learn.

What causes poverty? Why are poor people poor? Democrats never discuss this. Most sensible people already know the answer, however. More on this later…

John Edwards isn’t worthy of being president. He is a slimy lawyer who will do or say anything to get what he wants. He is pandering to the poor because they are the easiest group to win support from. All it takes is promises of more welfare freebies and stick-it-to-the-rich policies and they line up behind you.

Fact: The Democratic Party undermines the United States and the American way of life every chance it gets.

Whether it is destroying the American economy and jobs with high taxation, giving amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants and millions more of their family members, or making life easier for terrorists, you can count on the Democratic Party to do the exact opposite of what is best for America.

Just a few months ago, Democrats failed in their pathetic attempt to force a withdrawal of troops from Iraq. The DFL didn’t even have enough votes from fellow Democrats without tacking on billions in pork-barrel spending to gain votes. (Democrats are whores waiting to be bought with the frivolous spending of taxpayer dollars.)

Yet despite their recent failings, Democrats are back in full force with their “Sabotage The Iraq War” campaign. The DFL’s latest proposal is to withdraw most troops from Iraq by April of 2008, leaving a small number behind to conduct training and engage in anti-terrorism operations. (Article)

But isn’t the Democrat’s latest proposal contrary to the wishes of their vocal, anti-war base? I thought the anti-war liberals wanted all troops out of Iraq immediately.

Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid (D-NV), is planning a rare all-night session–a theatrical gesture designed to appease the Democrats’ liberal base. A quote by Reid from the article:

We have to force the president to change this; otherwise we’re going to have American soldiers killed for the next 18 months unnecessarily.

Interesting… What makes anti-war liberals think that American soldiers subscribe to their views on anything? During the 2004 presidential election, military personnel supported George Bush over born-again, anti-war zealot John Kerry by a four-to-one margin.

Still, the Democrats are not talking about what will happen to Iraq if we leave. Democrats don’t like to look at issues logically, partly because they lack the logical reasoning ability and partly because if they did, they would realize that their policies make no sense at all.

Sure, it’s sad that American troops are being killed. There are many children who will grow up without a father. But, Democrats are not concerned about the loss of human life. They are concerned about pandering to their vocal anti-war base.

How can we tell? Easily: Since the start of the Iraq war, approximately 3,600 soldiers have been killed fighting terrorists. During that same period of time, approximately 52,000 people have been murdered in America—the majority of them murdered in Democrat-controlled inner cities by the Democrats’ most loyal voting bloc.

If Democrats cared about human life, they would look in their own backyards and do something about the senseless murders in their own communities. They would do something about the high rates of rape, robbery, and violent crime in Democrat-voting strongholds. But they don’t. And they won’t.

The DFL is using the Iraq War exclusively for political purposes because of its high visibility. Don’t expect Democrats to talk about the 16,500 people murdered each year. Those victims are nameless, faceless, and they won’t be the lead story on the national nightly newscasts. Thus, there is no political benefit for the Democrats.

We’ve heard the argument many times before: immigrants are coming to America to do the jobs that Americans won’t do. This argument is used by proponents of open borders to attempt to convince people to allow more immigrants into America by making the argument an economic one.

But here is something interesting to consider: there are millions of Americans on the welfare rolls right now who could, and should, be doing those jobs, but they don’t have to because the Democrats lavish them with generous welfare benefits for not working.

Why should some Democrat voter get off her fat, lazy ass and get a job when all she has to do is apply for welfare benefits? She gets free food, subsidized or free housing, free medical care, and even a cash payment for not working. Thanks to the Democrats, she’s got it made.

There are plenty of jobs people don’t want to do. Even doctors have to do things they don’t want to do like give prostate exams. Lots of us have had jobs that we hated, myself included. But we did them because we had no other choice.

So why do Democrats give the welfare class the choice of working or not working? It’s because the Democrats want votes. They tax the workers and give the money to lazy welfare parasites to buy votes. It’s that simple. Democrats buy votes with welfare benefits and cash payments.

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards are promising ever-greater welfare benefits at every campaign stop because that is what the welfare class wants. And Democrats, being the panderers that they are, are willing to screw over the majority of working Americans to win the votes of the welfare losers.

Democrats screw over America in multiple ways. They reward lazy, uneducated, unskilled losers with generous welfare benefits. Then, there is a resultant shortage of unskilled labor because millions of people are on welfare, so America has to rely on immigrants, many illegal, to do those jobs that Democrat voters should be doing.

There are millions of able-bodied people in America who have spent their entire lives on welfare because of the Democrats. Immigrants aren’t doing the jobs Americans don’t want to do, they are doing the jobs Americans don’t have to do thanks to the Democratic Party.

Elijah Page, a convicted murder, was executed yesterday in South Dakota. He pleaded guilty in 2000 for the brutal torture and murder of an acquaintance.

Yes, we all know how most liberals are fiercely opposed to the death penalty for murderers. It’s so sad that a man who tortured and killed another human being is put to death, isn’t it?

But I’m sure liberals will drown their sorrows in abortions.

Chopping up a fetus and tossing it in the garbage is a great way for liberals to get their minds off of things that trouble them.

This past weekend witnessed the latest propaganda attempt by Al Gore in his efforts to enrich himself by spreading unfounded hysteria and fear: Live Earth.

Apparently, having concerts all over the world that create unnecessary pollution which contributes (supposedly) to global warming is the proper thing to do to raise awareness in Gore’s twisted and limited mind. Much like a parent smoking pot to try to convince his children not to smoke pot, I guess…

How many thousands of tons of carbon dioxide were released into the atmosphere to fly the performers, their managers, roadcrew, and entourage around the world? How much pollution was created to generate the power for the lighting and sound systems? How many hundreds-of-thousands of concert-goers created pollution traveling to and from the concert sites?

Al Gore is a liberal fraud of the worst kind. He spreads hysteria and lies and positions himself to financially benefit from it. Al Gore is making money hand-over-fist from this global warming nonsense.

Unfortunately, left-wingers aren’t smart enough to see Gore for the fraud that he truly is. I mean, if it wasn’t enough that he flies around the world in private jets to give talks about global warming–for which he is handsomely compensated, and if it wasn’t enough that his one home used 20 times the amount of electricity as the average home, will a series of unnecessary, massively polluting concerts be enough to convince left-wingers of what a joke Al Gore is? I doubt it.

The next time I read an article from a star-struck liberal desperate for Gore to run for President because he is the only one who can save the world I am going to be sick.

Each and every time a Democrat opens his or her mouth, he or she proposes new social services spending and higher taxation. It’s fact. Democrats need your money so they can redistribute it and buy votes, which will keep them in power. Look at how Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, and Barack Obama propose new spending at every campaign stop.

On tonight’s showing of “60 Minutes”, there was a story about the impending disaster that will take place in the coming decades as a result of an aging population coupled with generous Social Security and Medicare benefits. The United States will not be able to pay for the benefits foolishly promised to the elderly.

So what do we do? Democrats want us to raise taxes, which will guarantee them eternal power. But one thing the Democrats never do, probably because they lack the intelligence to ponder such matters, is talk about the economic harm that comes from increases in taxation. (If Democrats had brains they wouldn’t be Democrats!)

How does raising taxes create jobs? How does taking the money away from a wealthy person who would otherwise invest it in productive activity create jobs? How does reducing the rate of return from investment by taxing it away stimulate investment? How does taking money out of the pockets of families create jobs?

Taking money out of our consumer-driven economy by raising taxes doesn’t create jobs. It kills jobs.

Think about it: if a family has $5,000 of discretionary income that they can save or spend per year, and the Democrats come along and their raise taxes by $1,000, that is a thousand dollars less the family has to spend on restaurants, recreational activities, vacations, household items, etcetera. The waitress who would otherwise get a tip won’t, the restaurant owner won’t get the business, the family won’t stay at a motel for a few days on a family get-away… It’s simple logic, right? Yet it escapes the vast majority of Democrat voters.

Not only do Democrat tax increases result in less spending and, hence, less jobs, it results in less saving for retirement, which makes people even more dependent on the government! Every policy the Democrats have is designed to push the nation closer to socialism and make the populace more dependent on the Democratic Party.

We need to look at the elderly and decide what we can and cannot afford to spend on a no-longer productive segment of society before we bankrupt the nation.

Everybody dies, right? You, me, and everyone we know and love will die one day. Nobody lives forever. It seems very foolish to me to spend $50,000 for open-heart surgery on a 77-year-old man when, statistically, he could drop dead at any moment. It seems like a total waste to spend $100,000 per year to keep an elderly Parkinson’s patient alive in a nursing home by hooking him up to a feeding tube, making him a prisoner in his own bed, when he would otherwise be out of his misery. Wouldn’t that money be better spent on the youth? If it is to be spent at all, that is, instead of allowing the people who earn that money to keep it.

The former principal of the high school I attended died several months ago. The obituary article in the paper mentioned how he died of complications from heart surgery. He was 77-years-old. How many college kids could have been put through college for the amount of money spent on that 77-year-old man’s heart surgery–which he didn’t live to benefit from? Even if he had lived, odds are he would have been dead in a few years anyway.

How many college kids could be put through college every year on the $500 billion America spends on Medicare alone? The youth are the future, right? Today’s youth are the ones who will make life better for those who come after us, right? So why is America devoting so much resources on the past?

In no way, shape, or form am I anti-elderly. I like senior citizens. Most of them are very nice people with history and wisdom to share. But that doesn’t change the fact that they have a foot in the grave and spending tens-of-thousands of dollars on them to keep them alive for a few more months or years is a complete waste of limited resources that would be better allocated to the youth.

People tell me that when I get old, I’ll look to the government to take care of me. That isn’t true. I’ve been in nursing homes, I’ve seen my grandparents slowly waste away until they died. I’d prefer to die a quick death than linger and be a burden to anyone–including taxpayers.

Most of the reviews I’ve read of this flick have been superficial to a sickening degree. The reviewers don’t examine the premises of the movie; instead, they focus solely on the production quality and emotional effect it has on them, which, most likely, taps into their pre-existing biases.

This review by Kurt Loder is different–it looks at the opposing view. According to Loder, Moore portrays socialized medicine as a panacea without ever examining the truth behind most government-run healthcare programs: long waiting lists, shortages, and sub-par care.

In typical liberal fashion, Moore omits critical facts that completely contradict his ideas, if not outright destroys them. Moore, as do most left-wingers, relies on the emotional aspect to convey his message. Liberals and Democrats have faulty logical reasoning abilities, so the only way to reach them is with emotional pleas. Moore has made many tens-of-millions of dollars doing just that.

Loder mentions in his review that Michael Moore refers to Hillary Clinton as “sexy”. Moore probably thinks a plate of doughnuts is sexy. If Moore had any credibility at all, he certainly doesn’t after saying that.

I wonder if Moore touches on the impact of obesity on healthcare costs…

If you are considering seeing Michael Moore’s “Sicko”, give this review a read before you go. Then decide if you want to make an already wealthy liberal charlatan even richer with your hard-earned money.

(Link to review)