Democrats want to steal all of your money. Republicans don’t want Democrats to steal any of your money. The Democrat notion of compromise: let Democrats steal half of your money; then next year they will come back and try to steal the other half.
According to NASA temperature anomaly data, the warmest years in the United States were during the 1930s. Not only that, but it was warmer from 1998 - 2001 than from 2002 - 2005; it was warmer in 1900 than in 2000. That’s not global warming, that’s global cooling! The average temperature anomaly has gone down!
The fact of the matter is that it is not possible to accurately determine the temperature of a vast planet like earth. The recorded temperature data is nothing more than a sample, probably not even random, and the differences in temperature are small, insignificant.
Al Gore is a money-grubbing fraud.
I happened to listen to the first hour of Rush Limbaugh on 08/08/2007, a rare treat as I am usually working when his program airs. Limbaugh played some audio from the recent Democratic union debate. Never in my life have I heard grown adults act like such little children. It was truly sickening, yet so typical of Democrats.
There isn’t much that I can say that wasn’t covered by Limbaugh. There was one guy crying, literally, because he lost 1/3rd of his pension and his health insurance when his employer went bankrupt. As Limbaugh mentioned after the commercial break, the ridiculous wages and benefits extorted by union members are the reason why these unionized companies are going bankrupt.
Democrat voters can’t see how their party’s policies destroy the economy and push jobs overseas. They can’t see how their party’s generous welfare benefits destroy communities and the fabric of society. Democrat voters are directly responsible for their own hardships. But they just aren’t smart enough to realize it; instead, they turn to multi-millionaire socialists like Hillary Clinton for salvation–salvation that can only come from within.
Democrat voters aren’t just crybabies, they’re idiots, too.
Just as everyone thought, Barack Obama is sinking in the polls, John Edwards is still DOA, and Hillary Clinton is widening her lead in the race for the Democratic nomination for the 2008 presidential race.
I sure hope Hillary wins the nomination. She’s going to get her butt kicked in the polls come election day! 
Hillary Clinton: 48%
Barack Obama: 26%
John Edwards: 12%
The only white male among the three is far behind. Liberals are tossing their white male counterparts aside like the garbage they are.
Hillary Clinton’s flip-flops, lies, and pandering are well documented. Her ever-changing positions will be detrimental to her among sensible voters, I’m sure. Hillary is a bigger flip-flopper than John Kerry was.
Here’s to Republican victory in 2008! 
Al Gore is now claiming that any dissent in the scientific community regarding global warming is the result of a campaign of disinformation funded by polluters. Gore said the following:
There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10 million a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community. In actuality, there is very little disagreement.”
Where does Al Gore get his information? What is his source for his $10 million claim? This sounds like Hillary Clinton’s “vast right-wing conspiracy” theory of several years ago.
Al Gore is one of the largest individual polluters in the world! Gore lives in three mansions, one of which uses 20 times the amount of energy as the average American home! Gore, an already-filthy-stinking-rich man, flies all over the world–sometimes in massively-polluting private jets–giving presentations about global warming–and charging $100,000 - $175,000 for an hour-and-a-half of work!
What an absolute fraud! How can any brain-dead fool support Al Gore or believe anything he says given his nauseating hypocrisy?
Al Gore doesn’t need to fly all over the world giving slideshow presentations about climate change–not in our information age. Anything he could possibly say could be said on a website.
Gore flies all over the world pumping thousands of pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere with each trip so he can make himself even richer. The personal appearance is the reason Gore gets paid, not the “information” he shares.
Gore and all this global warming nonsense is about money ($$$). Gore wants to make as much of it as possible. Democrats want to steal it from taxpayers. The notion of global warming is the means to an end for these dirty frauds and liars.
Follow the money and you’ll find the true motivation behind this global warming hysteria.
Check out Al Gore in his home office (from Time). How much CO2 goes into the atmosphere to power those four giant monitors?
How the hell can any thinking person give any credibility to anything Al Gore says? The man is a fraud!
Here is an article about Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards’ speech to the Teamster’s Union in Chicago, IL.
(Bloomberg Article About John Edwards)
Democrats promise to:
Why don’t Democrats ever discuss the detrimental effects their policies have on American jobs and manufacturing?
Wages are a concern for every employer, absolutely. But another concern–and depending on the industry, possibly the biggest concern–is taxes. Taxes are a direct bite out of your profits. Taxes mean not only less money for business owners, but also less money for reinvestment and further job creation. Employee wages are a cost of production, taxes are not.
Another huge concern is regulation. Do you think the restaurant owner who barely makes $75,000 in annual profits wants to be forced to buy health insurance for his part-time waitstaff?
If you want to push jobs overseas, tax businesses at a very high level and regulate every aspect of their activities. Mandate that businesses must waste time and money on things other than production. Also, make it very difficult to fire under-performing employees. Put in place an agency that vigorously investigates fraudulent and vindictive claims of “racism” which cost thousands of dollars to defend against.
Hmmm, Democrats in America are trying to push us toward the very things France is moving away from. Democrats could learn from France, particularly their economic troubles which were caused by these very same policies that Democrats are fighting for.
By the way, do you think John Edwards’ barber is a union barber?
In both the House and Senate, enough Democrats caved-in to pass legislation designed to give the federal government a greater ability to monitor the communications of foreigners.
Just about every article I read about this legislation said that Democrats joined Republicans so they wouldn’t “appear weak on terrorism”. Really?
Democrats have been negatively spinning this issue as “domestic spying” for a couple of years now, as if the Bush administration were randomly listening in on the communications of average Americans, which is just not true. Does the Democrats’ hampering of the ability of the government to find terrorists and prevent acts of war against civilians appear to be weak on terrorism? 
So, the real question is: did the Democrats who voted for the bill vote for it because they deemed the legislation to be in the best interest of the nation, or did they cast their votes for it because they were concerned about public appearances?
You never can tell with those dirty frauds and liars, the Democrats.
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was booed by liberals at the annual Yearly Kos convention. Yearly Kos is a convention put on by radical extremist liberals from the liberal nutjob blog Daily Kos. Daily Kos is a blog by socialists (progressives, they call themselves) intent on destroying America’s capitalist economy by extreme wealth confiscation, high taxes, and cradle-to-grave welfare benefits for anyone and everyone unwilling to work to support themselves.
Interestingly, Daily Kos has some of the highest advertising rates for blogs around and has tons of advertisements on its homepage. They also have sponsors for their convention.
You see, liberals–all liberals–are frauds who preach wealth redistribution and scorn for the rich while attempting to make as much money for themselves as they can. Daily Kos (and the scumbag who founded it) is no exception.
Clinton was booed, according to news reports, because she would not pledge to refuse campaign contributions from lobbyists. Of course Clinton wouldn’t make such a pledge. If she did, she might have to dip into her own wealth (estimated at $50 million) to help finance her campaign. Rich liberals are great at taking and spending other people’s money, but they keep a firm grip on their own.
Daily Kos guru Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, said, “We may decide she’s not our first choice, but she’s not a bad choice.” 
The fact that anti-war liberal nutjobs like the people at Daily Kos would ignore Hillary Clinton’s adamant support for the war and throw their backing to her was a given. Liberals have no guiding principles at all.
All these liberal nuts want is to feel powerful by seeing which presidential candidates will grovel before them the most. It’s funny to think how important these left-wing troglodytes must feel when the entire DFL presidential field flies in to grovel before them as they did at Yearly Kos. (And spewing massive amounts of “global warming” causing pollution into the atmosphere at the same time.)
Hillary will get on her hands and knees and pander to anyone at anytime. Hillary Clinton’s original support for the war is of no consequence. What matters is that she is on her hands and knees groveling before the liberal nuts; they are getting what they want.
If Hillary spent as much time on her hands and knees for her husband (Bill Clinton–remember him?) as she does for anti-war kooks and socialists, maybe her husband wouldn’t have cheated on her all throughout their phony marriage!
I knew it would only be a matter of time before Democrats and their left-wing communist voting base were politicizing the collapse of the Interstate 35W freeway bridge over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis, MN, in yet another pathetic attempt to press for tax increases.
“We need to raise taxes,” is the tired refrain from the “Bankrupt America Now” crowd. Democrats act like there is an endless supply of money ripe for the picking and taking it will not interfere with the economy one iota. That just isn’t true.
Democrats always insist that more money be spent on education, but when you tell them that districts that spend the most per student like Washington DC (about $13,348 per student in 2005) have significantly lower student test scores than much lower spending places like Utah ($5,216) or North Dakota ($7,829), they just don’t comprehend the point you are making. All they want is more tax revenue because the more money they have to spend the more power they have. That is the extent of a Democrat’s understanding.
The same applies to roads.
Everywhere you look, left-wingers are pinning the blame for this tragedy on a lack of funding for transportation. Representative Jim Oberstar (D-MN) criticized the Bush administration saying the following at a news conference the day following the collapse:
This administration failed to support robust investment in surface transportation and the funding to accompany it.
When asked if under funding by the Bush administration was responsible for the bridge collapse, Oberstar replied:
No. But the needs are immense. And if we don’t fund the program properly, then necessary bridge inspections can’t be conducted.
Another Democrat lie. The bridge was inspected in 2006, and has been inspected annually for the past several years. The 2007 inspection started, but was interrupted by construction work and was to continue later this fall.
So, under funding wasn’t responsible for the bridge collapse, the bridge was inspected regularly, yet somehow we are to believe that we need more spending and corresponding tax increases?
Democrats would be more convincing if they weren’t so easily caught in lies.
It so happens that there were serious concerns about the safety of this bridge due to cracking in the steel support structure. There was sufficient money to pay for repairs of this bridge and ensure the safety of the public. But the department of transportation decided against making the repairs, opting for closer inspections instead. Why? Who knows.
If the bridge was found to be unsafe, it should have been closed. Then nobody would have been on it and nobody would have been a victim of this tragedy. As part of the federal interstate system, it is very likely that federal funding for replacement of the bridge would have been available, at least a signifcant portion of the cost.
But it wasn’t found to be unsafe by inspectors to the extent that it was unusable. No amount of additional transportation spending or tax increases will change the fact that it was deemed safe. This, sadly, is a case of human error and not a case of insufficient transportation funding.
No matter which way the wind blows, Democrats will be pushing for tax increases. Always.
Star Tribune article about bridge safety concerns, cracking of support structure
Star Tribune editorial from left-winger arguing for tax increases
The major freeway bridge collapse over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on August 8th, 2007 is not believed to be a terrorist attack at this time.
Right now, reports are that there are seven people dead, with more bodies surely to be recovered when daylight begins. Cars, trucks, even construction workers working on the bridge all plunged into the river. A freight train passing under the bridge was crushed by concrete from the bridge deck.
I used to drive over this bridge everyday. I can’t say that I’m surprised that it collapsed. When you were stuck in traffic on the bridge in the exit lane to downtown Minneapolis or the University of Minnesota, you could feel the bridge shake when trucks passed in other lanes. It was scary! The bridge looked as if it were supported by toothpicks. The steel support structure didn’t look very impressive, especially when compared to other bridges in the area.
There is a system to spray ice-melting chemicals on the bridge deck during the winter. I’m wondering if it is possible that these ice melting chemicals could have helped corrode the metal support structure contributing to the collapse.
In Minnesota, Democrats have been fighting to raise all sorts of taxes. As part of their transportation tax increases of 2007, they wanted to hit an average family of four with $550 in additional taxes each year (not including the other tax increases sought by the DFL). These tax increases were vetoed by Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty.
I was watching the news coverage when someone whom I think was the former transportation director was insinuating that it was a lack of transportation spending that was to blame for the bridge collapse. Democrats will surely use this catastrophe as yet another excuse to raise taxes on working Americans.
Democrats are shameless thieves…and liars…and frauds…and hypocrites…
Local news stations with coverage:
The Interstate 35W bridge over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis collapsed during rush hour Wednesday. At around 6PM, the tail end of rush hour, both lanes of the bridge collapsed into the river. Dozens of vehicles including semis, a tanker truck, and a school bus were on the bridge at the time.
The indications are at the moment that this is a structural failing. At first, it looked like a terrorist attack. How often does a major freeway bridge collapse? That’s union labor, for you.
Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards has received much of his financial support from lawyers. More than half of donors to Edwards who listed their occupations revealed that they were lawyers.
Of course! Democrat John Edwards is a greedy lawyer who got rich filing frivolous lawsuits. It only makes sense that other greedy lawyers are going to support the man who will most vigorously fight against Republican efforts to reform the tort system and make it more difficult to get rich filing frivolous lawsuits.
This is the way it works: many, if not the majority, of Democrat politicians are lawyers. They write the laws. To assist their profession, they can write laws as simple or as complex as they want to. The more complex and difficult to interpret, the more people will need to hire lawyers. Also, politicians are in a position to encourage or discourage the filing of frivolous lawsuits via their legislative activities, determine attorney’s fees, and influence monetary awards and thus the incentive to file lawsuits.
If you look at the Democratic Party objectively, you will see nothing but rampant greed, fraud and self-serving behavior. From environmentalist frauds like Al Gore charging $100,000 to give 75-minute presentations on the horrors of global warming, to movie makers who make fake documentaries full of lies, to multi-millionaires like Hillary Clinton who want to steal taxpayer money to help the poor while refusing to use her own wealth, all you will find is greed and fraud.
(Article)