It is no secret that the Democratic Party has a lock on the low IQ vote.

Democrat-voting strongholds have the lowest academic achievement in the modernized world. As the proportion of the DFL vote increases, the academic achievement decreases in a given district.

The primary factor in academic achievement is intelligence, not family income, as wealth redistributing liberals and communists have argued for years. And yes, there is a strong genetic basis to intelligence. Smart parents on balance have smart kids. This explains why Democrats keep getting elected in Democrat strongholds despite a 50-year track record of failure, crime, dismal education, welfare dependence, fleeing businesses, high taxes, decay, etcetera.

But a new survey by Associated Press-Yahoo! News indicates that there are many more idiots in America than previously thought.

http://news.yahoo.com/page/election-2008-political-pulse-change

According to a new Associated Press-Yahoo! News survey, large majorities of voters believe the president has considerable sway on issues such as inflation, interest rates, the federal deficit, taxes and more. Fully three-quarters believe the president has at least some influence over health care costs. And 69 percent can see the president making gasoline prices go up or down.

Unbelievable! Do the people think the President of the United States is a deity? Do they not realize how the government works and how the role of the President is more ceremonial than functional?

It’s almost as if some people look to their President as a God. Well, Democrat voters look to the welfare state as a God, largely because they are so incapable of taking care of themselves. But Democrats only represent between 45%-50% of the population. Where are the other idiots coming from? Is it immigration?

A few years ago I read a great report by a professor at Harvard who argued that the national IQ will fall as America takes in more low IQ immigrants from Africa and Latin America. These are not my claims, but the claims from a paper I read a few years ago that I can no longer find. I wonder if maybe there is something to that theory. More stupid people means more Democrat voters. Perhaps this is why Democrats are so eager to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants.

John Edwards…what a *&^%$#@ loser! He never stood a chance. Since he first announced he was running he trailed badly. He had a campaign of nothing. Finally, he has made it official: he is dropping out of the 2008 Presidential race. Big surprise…

I predicted Edwards would fail miserably. And he did not disappoint.

But who will Edwards endorse? I bet he will endorse Barack Hussein Obama. Hillary Clinton was the chosen one, yet she is being snubbed by all the prominent Democrats who have thrown their support behind Obama. John Kerry snubbed her. A few days ago Ted Kennedy snubber her. Edwards will probably snub her as well.

Well, here we have another bogus study conducted by liberals. This time, the study isn’t a gross exaggeration of Iraq civilian deaths, a study that was recently proven to be full of excrement. This latest one is a study of “false statements” made by the Bush administration to justify the Iraq War, undertaken by liberal “journalism organizations”. The so-called study was conducted by the Center for Public Integrity and the Fund for Independence in Journalism. Yeah, as if we are too dumb to realize that there is neither integrity nor independence to be found in either of those two organizations just because their names give the impression otherwise…

(MSNBC Article)

Too bad they don’t mention that 100% of the statements Bush made about Iraq, its WMD programs, and nuclear aspirations was said years earlier by Democrats. See our Democrat Iraq War Quotes for more.

This so-called study is left-wing propaganda and nothing more. A statement is only false if the person saying it knows it to be untrue. For example, serial rapist Bill Clinton made false statements about not having a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky because he knew that he did indeed have such a relationship with her. Bill Clinton lied. He made false statements. Bush did not.

When you make a statement based on information you believe to be true, that is not a deliberate false statement or a lie. We live in a world of imperfect information. As such, we must formulate our views based on the information we have access to. Bush and the Democrats years before him were given information claiming that Saddam was a threat and they all believed it.

Democrats and Republicans almost universally felt that Saddam Hussein was a threat, a viewpoint that was justified because Saddam was a mass murderer and did at one time have and use chemical weapons against civilians, never proving that he got rid of him as required. Saddam Hussein was a dangerous man. Revisionist history doesn’t change the truth.

This type of bogus study and the unbalanced, biased news coverage it generates will only serve to fool the idiots and dolts among us into believing, the few that don’t already, that Bush lied. But a quick internet search reveals a treasure trove of Democrat quotes, all of which make the same claims Bush made about Iraq, some of them years before Bush was fairly elected in 2000.

In a speech to the floor of the Senate, John Kerry said the following on November 9th, 1997—a full three years before Bush was elected:

“We must recognize that there is no indication that Saddam Hussein has any intention of relenting. So we have an obligation of enormous consequence, an obligation to guarantee that Saddam Hussein cannot ignore the United Nations. He cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction.”

On December 16th, 1998, Bill Clinton said in a speech to the nation:

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons…”

“The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government — a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people.”

There is much, much more where that came from. Watch this Youtube video for more Democrat quotes about how dangerous Saddam Hussein was back in the late 1990s and early 2000s.

(Youtube Video - Democrat Hypocrisy)

You see, the truth is out there. You just have to spend a few minutes to look for it. But judging by how many millions of Democrat voters spend their entire lives on welfare because they are too lazy to get off their fat butts to get jobs to support themselves and their families, I don’t expect many of them to spend the two minutes necessary to discover the truth behind these “Bush lied” claims. Thus, they will happily believe whatever the liberal media tells them and believe it to be true, unquestioned.

The Iraq War is just as much the Democrats’ War as it is Bush’s. They were the ones who laid the groundwork for war all during the 1990s with their never-ending claims of Saddam being such a dangerous threat to the world.

Ignorance and idiocy are the best friends of the Democratic Party.

Hillary Clinton has finally lost the support of African-American Democrat supporters. According to a new CNN poll, 59% of black Democrats now back Barack Obama, giving him a 28-point lead over Mrs. Clinton. Just three months ago Hillary Clinton had a 24-point lead over Obama. My, how things have changed.

Why would black people support a rich white woman like Hillary Clinton, anyway? Hillary doesn’t live among them, socialize with them, or have much else to do with them other than pandering for their vote.

I think it’s great that white liberals are getting shut out by their beloved minority voters. Minorities are going to toss these white liberals in the garbage like the trash they are. And it’s about time! Just ask John Edwards.

The Democratic Party destroys communities. Even worse, Democrats aren’t smart enough to realize what they have done. This is not surprising since Democrat communities have the lowest academic achievement in the modernized world. And the DFL’s solution to the problem they created is more of what created it in the first place.

Back in the 1950s, parents could raise their children in the inner city. There weren’t shootings every night. Kids didn’t step over dead bodies on the way to school in the morning. Then the Democrats rolled out their grand vote buying welfare programs, absolving people of responsibility for taking care of themselves. The more irresponsibility a Democrat voter engaged in, the more welfare money they got.

Then the crime rate exploded. More welfare, more housing projects, the more the crime increased. Now, Democrat voting inner city strongholds are hellholes of crime and violence. Shootings and murder are a regular way of life. Rapes and robberies are common as well. Many Democrat strongholds like Chicago, Minneapolis, Detroit, and others have thousands of robberies every year.

Here is a video news story from ABC News. In this story, a doctor discusses how doctors train in emergency rooms in Democrat voting strongholds so they can learn how to treat soldiers wounded in combat. The story mentions how there are many times more people killed in the inner cities every year than killed in Iraq.

Video

In America, there are about 16,500 people murdered each year. The majority of these murders occur in Democrat inner cities and are committed by the Democrats’ most coveted voters.

Let me ask you this: why do Democrat voters keep electing Democrats when it is plain as day that the Democrats are the ones who are responsible for all the crime and violence? Consider that Democrat strongholds have the lowest academic achievement in the modernized world. The answer is that Democrats are stupid. Failures in school, failures in life. Stupid is as stupid does. That is the reason Democrats keep power in these communities.

Barack Obama has taken a 10-point lead over Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, according to a new poll from Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby released today.

This is bad news. While Barack Obama is just as much of a socialist as Hillary Clinton, he is much cleaner and more intelligent than she could ever hope to be (which isn’t saying much).

Hillary Clinton’s only experience other than riding her husband’s coattails is coordinating smear campaigns against women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault and rape. Hillary has a lot of experience in this area. Obama doesn’t have any real scandals dogging his bid for the Presidency.

Obama isn’t filthy stinking rich like Hillary Clinton, or even John Edwards is. Most Democrat voters live their entire lives seething with jealously and rage over people who have nicer things and more money because they are more intelligent or harder working. Obama is closer to the “common man”, or at least the common Democrat-voting Neanderthal, than any of the other DFL candidates.

Obama is smarter, cleaner, and less wealthy than any of the other Democratic candidates battling it out in this 2008 election campaign. One would think that his closer proximity to the common Democratic Party voter would be helpful to him.

Many, if not most, Republicans were hoping that Hillary would win the nomination just for the simple fact that she is unlikeable and her idiocy would likely be her downfall. Unfortunately, she couldn’t keep her stupidity under wraps and torpedoed her own campaign before securing the nomination for which she has long been the odds-on favorite to win. Damn that Hillary!

Liberal Al Qaeda leader Adam Gadahn called for attacks on President Bush when he visits the Middle East this week.

“Now we direct an urgent call to our militant brothers in Muslim Palestine and the Arab peninsula … to be ready to receive the Crusader slayer Bush in his visit to Muslim Palestine and the Arab peninsula in the beginning of January and to receive him not with flowers or clapping but with bombs and booby-trapped vehicles,” said the California born liberal terrorist in a newly released video.

Terrorists think like liberals, liberals think like terrorists. So, calling this Al Qaeda member a liberal is justified. He’s as left wing as one can get. It is amazing just how similar the views of Bin Laden and other terrorists are to those of the liberal left and most Democrat politicians.

Let’s look at some similarities between liberals and terrorists. Both liberals and terrorists:

• Have an irrational hatred of Bush for no good reason
• Want the US to surrender Iraq to Al Qaeda giving the terrorist organization millions of new conscripts
• Hate Israel
• Want to domineer their fellow man
• Target US service members for attacks: liberals attack with smear campaigns and slander, terrorists with bombs
• Call the United States an imperialist oppressor, as if giving freedom to people is oppression
• Want terrorists to be treated well by US forces while they are free to behead and bomb anyone they desire
• Make it easier for terrorists to conduct acts of terrorism by hamstringing US counter terrorism efforts
• Misrepresent the truth by claiming America is losing in Iraq

There are many more similarities between liberals and terrorists. But I don’t have all day to cover them.

Twisted left-wing minds think alike.

(ABC News Story)

Barack Obama has been projected the winner of the Democratic primary in Iowa just a few minutes ago, edging out Hillary Clinton and John Edwards who came in close behind him.

Of course, this is just a projection and we know how often the left-leaning news media has been wrong in the past.

The idiot Hillary Clinton really blew it, didn’t she? She was the anointed one. She had a huge lead and by her own actions and her lies she deconstructed her own campaign.

While most Democrat voters aren’t very bright, not all of them are complete idiots. (I’d estimate that 90% of Democrat voters are idiots. See the dismal academic achievement in Democrat-voting strongholds for proof.) Hillary Clinton was caught in flip-flops about driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants. She was caught in an outright lie when she claimed she had no knowledge of questioners being coached by her staffers, even though she called on them directly out of hundreds of people (the odds of that are slim-to-none.)

Barack Obama has little experience. His strategy is the tried and true Democrat strategy: buy votes by promising all sorts of welfare benefits. You see, absolving people of responsibility for their own lives is the name of the game for the modern Democratic Party. And everybody loves a freebie, don’t they?

If Obama does win Iowa, it will be a devastating blow to Hillary Clinton considering how wet behind the ears he is. I guess her serial rapist husband Bill Clinton didn’t have enough star power to carry her to the top, unlike Obama supporter Oprah Winfrey.

On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee is NBC’s projected winner, besting Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani.