According to this article, nearly one-third of white Democrats think that Hillary Clinton is a phony.

Article

Still, Clinton, 60, has provided ammunition to opponents. She has insisted that she supported weapons inspections, not war, in Iraq in 2002, although she gave speeches that year advocating action against Saddam Hussein before voting to authorize the use of force.

GASP! Oh really?! These people are just figuring out that Hillary Clinton is a total and complete fraud? (But then again, so is Barack Obama, and just about every Democrat.)

The article discusses Hillary Clinton’s numerous flip-flops, resume embellishments, and outright lies. It goes on to say that in this information age anyone can hop online and find the truth about what a candidate did, said, or supported in the past. That is very true. Hillary Clinton’s lies can easily be revealed. Too bad she isn’t smart enough to figure that out.

In years past, Democrats relied on their voting base to believe anything they said. Today, a large proportion still do. But in this highly contested race for the Democratic Party nomination, journalists are going to be scrutinizing each candidate more closely than they otherwise would, meaning that anything from the past–no matter how big or small–that contradicts what the candidate is saying today is going to get attention and be disseminated to the masses.

Hillary Clinton is her own worst enemy.

Everywhere you look, prominent Democrats are turning their backs on Hillary Clinton and embracing Barack Obama.

Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey has announced that he is going to endorse Obama.

Why are all these DFLers shunning the Clintons? What did the Clintons do to deserve such treatment? They are the same dirty frauds and liars they were five, ten, and fifteen years ago. So what changed?

Is it possible that all the leaders of the Democratic Party have gotten themselves swept up in Obamamania? Are they moved by Obama’s empty platitudes and elevated speaking voice? Have they completely ignored the fact that Obama is bought and paid for by a Muslim businessman under indictment, Tony Rezko?

What did Hillary do to cause so many people whom she thought were her friends to abandon her? Somebody should investigate this and write a book about it.

Democrats for years have bemoaned campaign contributions from corporate and wealthy interests. But it turns out that the Democrats have been the largest beneficiaries of Wall Street contributions this campaign season, with Barack Obama leading the way.

Today Obama criticized Wall Street and business in general for its “ethic of greed” in contributing to the foreclosure crisis. Meanwhile, Obama has been taking in cash hand over fist from these very same people he now criticizes.

So, why is Obama criticizing a group of people while taking in huge campaign contributions from them? Doesn’t Obama realize that this “ethic of greed” he criticizes is what allowed those people to make the money that they are giving to him?

Obama has taken in $6.7 million from investment and securities firms. Hillary Clinton has received $6.6 million. John McCain, to contrast, has only received about $3 million.

If Obama and Hillary feel so strongly that Wall Street has acted in a manner detrimental to their voting base, why are they taking the money? Shouldn’t they give it back?

The fact of the matter is that these Democrats–all of them–are nothing but frauds, phonies, and liars. They hobnob with the rich and famous. They attend fancy parties, drink the finest champagne, and dine on the finest food. They travel by private jet and limousine. They are far removed from the common man. Yet, when they need some votes, they spout their populist rhetoric and the Democrat voters lap it up. And when they need money, they are more than happy to take it from the very people they pretend to be against.

Yahoo Article

A new poll shows that Hillary Clinton’s likability has dropped recently. Forty-eight percent of poll respondents had a negative view of Clinton; only 37% viewed her positively.

Is anybody surprised? If her husband liked her, would he cheat on her constantly and do so to this very day? Probably not.

Nobody likes Hillary. Not ever her husband, Bill.

What can Hillary do to make herself more likable? Maybe she should bake some cookies. It’s obvious that people don’t like her for her personality or her ideas.

There was a great syndicated article the other day written by Shailagh Murray and Jonathan Weisman of the Washington Post that demonstrates just what kind of dirty frauds and liars Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are. Despite having absolutely no accomplishments of their own to speak of during their scant careers, both Clinton and Obama are positioning themselves to take credit for legislation they had no part of creating.

Here’s a recent example from the article:

Just this week, as the financial markets were roiling in the wake of the Bear Stearns collapse, Obama made another claim that was greeted with disbelief in some corners of Capitol Hill. On March 13, Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, unveiled legislative proposals to allow the Federal Housing Administration to guarantee new loans from banks willing to help homeowners in or approaching foreclosure. Obama and Clinton were in Washington for a day-long round of budget voting, but neither appeared at the housing news conference.

Yet Obama on Monday appeared to seek top billing on Dodd’s proposal.

“At this moment, we must come together and act to address the housing crisis that set this downturn in motion and continues to eat away at the public’s confidence in the market,” Obama said. “We should pass the legislation I put forward with my colleague Chris Dodd to create meaningful incentives for lenders to buy or refinance existing mortgages so that Americans facing foreclosure can keep their homes.”

Dodd did say that Obama supported the bill, as does Clinton. But he could not offer pride of authorship to the candidate he wants to see in the White House next year.

Can you believe the gall of Barack Obama? Does he really think that the people will never discover the truth?

If Barack Obama spent as much time actually working on behalf of the people as he does plagiarizing speeches he would be a very productive politician.

Ah, Hillary Clinton. So many qualifications to be Commander in Chief… Yes, she sure has a lot of experience–at doing nothing.

In order to portray herself as ready for the position of President, Hillary tends to exaggerate her experience. Unless, of course, it’s about something negative, then she had nothing to do with it.

Some people actually believe her.

Now Hillary has been caught red-faced in a lie. Not a little white lie, not an embellishment, an outright lie. Mrs. Clinton said last week during a speech that she came under sniper fire while on a diplomatic trip to Bosnia in March of 1996. Hillary was quoted as saying:

“I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”

Not only does that statement contradict what Hillary herself wrote in her own book, but it is the exact opposite of what really happened. Hillary didn’t have to run with her head down. She is seen in a Youtube video smiling and shaking hands as she and her party stood on the tarmac.

What a liar!

Here’s a video on Youtube of Hillary making the statements and video from the Bosnia trip.

Video

Who in their right mind could support a liar and fraud like Hillary Clinton?

Democrat hero of the day, Barack Hussein Obama, has been caught in more lies.

Obama has been promising “change” in Washington and an end to politics as usual. The mindless Democrat voting drones have been eating up Obama’s drivel like a welfare recipient at an all-you-can-eat Twinkie buffet. These people are stupid, they’ll believe anything!

Last year, and brought to light again more recently, was the story of how Barack Obama engaged in a joint real estate transaction with Muslim, Syrian-born crook Antoin “Tony” Rezko, so Obama could get a $300,000 discount on a large, luxurious mansion. Originally, Obama downplayed his association to Rezko saying that the man accused of bribing officials, fraud, and other crimes, was just another nameless, faceless donor. That was a lie. The truth of the matter is that they were close friends, Obama directly sought out Rezko’s help arranging a deal for the property, and Rezko has bought and paid for Barack Obama, giving him his start in politics including his very first campaign contributions.

Now, Obama has been caught in another lie regarding his friend and spiritual advisor, the vehemently racist Reverend Jeremiah Wright. This is from ABC News:

Buried in his eloquent, highly praised speech on America’s racial divide, Sen. Barack Obama contradicted more than a year of denials and spin from him and his staff about his knowledge of Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s controversial sermons.

Similarly, Obama also has only recently given a much fuller accounting of his relationship with indicted political fixer Antoin “Tony” Rezko, a longtime friend, who his campaign once described as just one of “thousands of donors.”

Until yesterday, Obama said the only thing controversial he knew about Rev. Wright was his stand on issues relating to Africa, abortion and gay marriage.

But yesterday, he told a different story.

“Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes,” he said in his speech yesterday in Philadelphia.

There you have it. Barack Obama admits that he is a liar.

One must wonder how absolutely stupid a person must be to think that Barack Obama, the son of a Muslim, bought and paid for by a crooked Muslim businessman, is suitable to be the leader of the free world.

There is no question that now that the media has more closely scrutinized Obama, that major cracks in his highly polished, plagiarized facade have appeared. It starts with a hairline crack, then it only gets larger until the real Barack Hussein Obama is revealed.

Just wait.

A new poll from CNN/Opinion Research Corporation indicates that a majority of registered Democrats want Barack Obama to be the Democratic Party nominee for President.

Obama was the preferred choice of 52% of the respondents, compared to 45% for Hillary Clinton.

This speaks volumes about the intelligence of Democrat voters. Barack Obama is bought and paid for by a Muslim businessman. He is the son of a Muslim. He has absolutely no experience on his thin resume to demonstrate his fitness to be leader of the free world.

Oh, but Obama makes people feel “hopeful”. He’s going “end the Iraq War”, even though he refuses to pledge to withdraw troops. And, apparently, he is going to clean up Washington by engaging in real estate transactions with criminals.

It’s amazing just how many prominent Democrats have turned their backs on Hillary Clinton. Does she have any friends left in the Democratic Party?

Former State Department official Greg Craig has slammed Hillary Clinton’s claim of experience. this is from the CNN Political Tracker Blog:

“If you’re running for president on the basis of your claims of experience, when you then cite examples, you should be careful to be accurate,” Craig said. “The evidence should be accurate. And my point is that Senator Clinton and her supporters have in serious ways overstated, if not grossly exaggerated, the nature of her experience.”

“I think she is misleading the American public on the nature of her experience.”

But what kind of experience does Barack Obama, whom Craig supports, have? Obama has even less. Hillary has the experience of being cheated on constantly. I don’t even know if they slept in the same bed in the White House. I would guess not. She has seven years of experience in the Senate during which time she has produced no significant legislation.

Obama has a whopping three years of experience in the Senate. He hasn’t produced any significant legislation, either.

Let’s contrast that to John McCain. McCain comes from a military family. He, his father, and his grandfather all served in the United States Navy. McCain served in the military for 20 years, valiantly and fearlessly, spending 5-1/2 of those years as a prisoner of war and victim of torture. Then McCain served four years in the US House before being elected to the Senate where he has served for 21 years.

How can these Democrats even dare talk about experience when Clinton and Obama combined have less than 1/4 the experience McCain has? The Democratic Party is a total and complete joke.

But what did Hillary Clinton do to cause all these prominent Democrats to shun her?

I love this!

The Democratic Party is segregating itself along racial lines. Blacks are turning their backs on Hillary Clinton, whites are turning away from Barack Obama.

New York Times Article

Race has been a defining feature of the primary contests. Beyond Mississippi, Mrs. Clinton was backed by 5 percent of black voters in Illinois, Mr. Obama’s home state; 8 percent in Wisconsin, where black voters made up 8 percent of the Democratic primary vote; 9 percent in Delaware; 10 percent in Virginia; and 11 percent in Georgia, all states Mr. Obama won.

Mr. Obama’s 26 percent support among whites in Tuesday’s primary was one of his worst performances with this group.

He had previously been supported by 16 percent of white voters in Arkansas; 23 percent in Florida, where the candidates did not actively campaign; 24 percent in South Carolina, where John Edwards was still competing; and 25 percent in Alabama.

Most of the elite Democrats have shunned Hillary and thrown their support to Obama. But most of the white Democrat rank and file voters are not supporting the candidate that the most prominent members of the Democratic Party have endorsed.

One can only hope that this results in the Democratic Party being fractured beyond repair. I’ve got my fingers crossed.

The idiocy of the Democratic Party never ends!

At a time when oil has reached a record price, just under $110 per barrel, Democrats in the House Natural Resources Committee passed a bill to permanently ban oil drilling off the coast of Sonoma and Marin Counties in California.

According to this article, oil companies have long wanted to get at the oil offshore. The Democrat plan would double size the of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank national marine sanctuaries, preventing access to the liquid gold beneath the ocean floor.

Now, unless you are a total and complete idiot, in other words, a Democrat, you know that the Democratic Party has been blocking domestic oil drilling for years.

In all the years from 2001 to 2006, Democrats have blocked oil drilling in Alaska, and more recently they have blocked oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

Most Democrat voters are either not smart enough to care about this or are unwilling to look beyond their hand which is extended for more welfare freebies. The Democratic Party’s policy of blocking domestic oil drilling is raising the cost of everything they buy, harming productivity, and costing them a fortune at the pump.

But those Democrats just aren’t smart enough to see it, are they?

At a time when the United States–and all of the free world–is at war with radical Islamists, Democrat voters have decided to elect another Muslim to Congress.

Andre Carson was elected to the US House Of Representatives from his district covering the Indianapolis, Indiana, area. He’s the grandson of the late DFL Representative Julia Carson, who died in December of 2007 and whose seat he is filling.

Andre Carson converted to Islam a decade ago. As you can imagine, he is eager to pull troops out of Iraq, surrendering it to radical Islamists. Who would have ever guessed that a Muslim would want to surrender to Muslims?

No matter what the situation is, you can always count on Democrat voters to act in a self-destructive manner. Democrat allies such as union members destroy the free market and push jobs overseas with ridiculous wage and benefit demands. Unionized teachers destroy the education system and hold it hostage as a bargaining chip. Then you’ve got generation after generation of Democrat-voting welfare parasites destroying communities with crime and violence.

Now they are electing Muslims to positions of power when we are at war with radical Islamists. Pure Democrat brilliance…

Article

This is so sweet! The current governor of the state of New York, and former state Attorney General, Eliot Spitzer, has been implicated in a upscale prostitution ring. Spitzer is a typical Democrat: he is a phony. While he pretended to play the role of a crusader for law and justice, he is in actuality nothing more than a liar and whore monger.

Bloomberg News Story

Governor Spitzer is a married man with three children. He prosecuted prostitution rings as Attorney General, now he is implicated as a customer in one. Perhaps he should change his name to John Spitzer.