Barack Obama is planning to propose new shareholders’ rights legislation that gives no rights to corporate shareholders at all.

Obama’s plan would require corporations to have a non-binding vote on executive compensation packages. Shareholders would not be allowed to limit nor deny executive compensation under Obama’s plan.

So what good would Obama’s plan do? Absolutely none. This is an insanely stupid plan which does nothing more than codify his empty rhetoric into a law which is as equally empty.

Shareholder rights are a good thing. Allowing shareholders to have a say in executive compensation is also a good thing. But Obama’s plan does neither of those things. In fact, it does nothing at all. It is as meaningless as everything he says.

Barack Obama has been the beneficiary of tens-of-millions of dollars in contributions from corporate bigwigs. In fact, Obama has been the largest recipient of cash from Wall Street executives. Is this proposal Obama’s way of appealing to his base which is incapable of distinguishing substance from fluff while at the same time staying on good terms with corporate bigwigs who have lavished him with cash? I think so.

Obama’s Shareholder Rights Plan

Everywhere you look, prominent Democrats are turning their backs on Hillary Clinton and embracing Barack Obama.

Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey has announced that he is going to endorse Obama.

Why are all these DFLers shunning the Clintons? What did the Clintons do to deserve such treatment? They are the same dirty frauds and liars they were five, ten, and fifteen years ago. So what changed?

Is it possible that all the leaders of the Democratic Party have gotten themselves swept up in Obamamania? Are they moved by Obama’s empty platitudes and elevated speaking voice? Have they completely ignored the fact that Obama is bought and paid for by a Muslim businessman under indictment, Tony Rezko?

What did Hillary do to cause so many people whom she thought were her friends to abandon her? Somebody should investigate this and write a book about it.

Democrats for years have bemoaned campaign contributions from corporate and wealthy interests. But it turns out that the Democrats have been the largest beneficiaries of Wall Street contributions this campaign season, with Barack Obama leading the way.

Today Obama criticized Wall Street and business in general for its “ethic of greed” in contributing to the foreclosure crisis. Meanwhile, Obama has been taking in cash hand over fist from these very same people he now criticizes.

So, why is Obama criticizing a group of people while taking in huge campaign contributions from them? Doesn’t Obama realize that this “ethic of greed” he criticizes is what allowed those people to make the money that they are giving to him?

Obama has taken in $6.7 million from investment and securities firms. Hillary Clinton has received $6.6 million. John McCain, to contrast, has only received about $3 million.

If Obama and Hillary feel so strongly that Wall Street has acted in a manner detrimental to their voting base, why are they taking the money? Shouldn’t they give it back?

The fact of the matter is that these Democrats–all of them–are nothing but frauds, phonies, and liars. They hobnob with the rich and famous. They attend fancy parties, drink the finest champagne, and dine on the finest food. They travel by private jet and limousine. They are far removed from the common man. Yet, when they need some votes, they spout their populist rhetoric and the Democrat voters lap it up. And when they need money, they are more than happy to take it from the very people they pretend to be against.

Yahoo Article

There was a great syndicated article the other day written by Shailagh Murray and Jonathan Weisman of the Washington Post that demonstrates just what kind of dirty frauds and liars Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are. Despite having absolutely no accomplishments of their own to speak of during their scant careers, both Clinton and Obama are positioning themselves to take credit for legislation they had no part of creating.

Here’s a recent example from the article:

Just this week, as the financial markets were roiling in the wake of the Bear Stearns collapse, Obama made another claim that was greeted with disbelief in some corners of Capitol Hill. On March 13, Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, unveiled legislative proposals to allow the Federal Housing Administration to guarantee new loans from banks willing to help homeowners in or approaching foreclosure. Obama and Clinton were in Washington for a day-long round of budget voting, but neither appeared at the housing news conference.

Yet Obama on Monday appeared to seek top billing on Dodd’s proposal.

“At this moment, we must come together and act to address the housing crisis that set this downturn in motion and continues to eat away at the public’s confidence in the market,” Obama said. “We should pass the legislation I put forward with my colleague Chris Dodd to create meaningful incentives for lenders to buy or refinance existing mortgages so that Americans facing foreclosure can keep their homes.”

Dodd did say that Obama supported the bill, as does Clinton. But he could not offer pride of authorship to the candidate he wants to see in the White House next year.

Can you believe the gall of Barack Obama? Does he really think that the people will never discover the truth?

If Barack Obama spent as much time actually working on behalf of the people as he does plagiarizing speeches he would be a very productive politician.

Democrat hero of the day, Barack Hussein Obama, has been caught in more lies.

Obama has been promising “change” in Washington and an end to politics as usual. The mindless Democrat voting drones have been eating up Obama’s drivel like a welfare recipient at an all-you-can-eat Twinkie buffet. These people are stupid, they’ll believe anything!

Last year, and brought to light again more recently, was the story of how Barack Obama engaged in a joint real estate transaction with Muslim, Syrian-born crook Antoin “Tony” Rezko, so Obama could get a $300,000 discount on a large, luxurious mansion. Originally, Obama downplayed his association to Rezko saying that the man accused of bribing officials, fraud, and other crimes, was just another nameless, faceless donor. That was a lie. The truth of the matter is that they were close friends, Obama directly sought out Rezko’s help arranging a deal for the property, and Rezko has bought and paid for Barack Obama, giving him his start in politics including his very first campaign contributions.

Now, Obama has been caught in another lie regarding his friend and spiritual advisor, the vehemently racist Reverend Jeremiah Wright. This is from ABC News:

Buried in his eloquent, highly praised speech on America’s racial divide, Sen. Barack Obama contradicted more than a year of denials and spin from him and his staff about his knowledge of Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s controversial sermons.

Similarly, Obama also has only recently given a much fuller accounting of his relationship with indicted political fixer Antoin “Tony” Rezko, a longtime friend, who his campaign once described as just one of “thousands of donors.”

Until yesterday, Obama said the only thing controversial he knew about Rev. Wright was his stand on issues relating to Africa, abortion and gay marriage.

But yesterday, he told a different story.

“Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes,” he said in his speech yesterday in Philadelphia.

There you have it. Barack Obama admits that he is a liar.

One must wonder how absolutely stupid a person must be to think that Barack Obama, the son of a Muslim, bought and paid for by a crooked Muslim businessman, is suitable to be the leader of the free world.

There is no question that now that the media has more closely scrutinized Obama, that major cracks in his highly polished, plagiarized facade have appeared. It starts with a hairline crack, then it only gets larger until the real Barack Hussein Obama is revealed.

Just wait.

A new poll from CNN/Opinion Research Corporation indicates that a majority of registered Democrats want Barack Obama to be the Democratic Party nominee for President.

Obama was the preferred choice of 52% of the respondents, compared to 45% for Hillary Clinton.

This speaks volumes about the intelligence of Democrat voters. Barack Obama is bought and paid for by a Muslim businessman. He is the son of a Muslim. He has absolutely no experience on his thin resume to demonstrate his fitness to be leader of the free world.

Oh, but Obama makes people feel “hopeful”. He’s going “end the Iraq War”, even though he refuses to pledge to withdraw troops. And, apparently, he is going to clean up Washington by engaging in real estate transactions with criminals.

The last couple of weeks have seen an increase in pro Barack Hussein Obama propaganda in the media. The message the left-wingers are sending is that Barack Hussein is going to capture votes from Republicans because of his message.

No, he will not. Barack Obama’s message is hollow. There is nothing there. He is a thinly veiled Martin Luther King Jr. wannabe and we Conservatives can see right through it.

Obama has not said a single thing of substance this entire campaign. He has no real experience in an executive position. He has articulated no concrete ideas other than his socialist agenda of more wealth redistribution and welfare entitlements.

Sorry, Democrats, we Conservatives are not stupid. Compare the academic achievement in our communities versus yours. We can see Barack Obama for the non-substantive, inexperienced wannabe that he is. We Conservatives do not vote based on looks or charisma. We do not vote based on “positive messages” that are not based in reality.

It is you left-wingers who do that. That is why you elected a serial rapist like Bill Clinton to the Presidency twice and why you continue to idolize him to this day.

Just the fact that a man like Barack Hussein Obama with no real experience and no concrete plans can capture the backing of so many prominent Democrats and their voters speaks volumes about the intellect of Democrats. Or, should I say, the lack of intellect.

Hillary Clinton has finally lost the support of African-American Democrat supporters. According to a new CNN poll, 59% of black Democrats now back Barack Obama, giving him a 28-point lead over Mrs. Clinton. Just three months ago Hillary Clinton had a 24-point lead over Obama. My, how things have changed.

Why would black people support a rich white woman like Hillary Clinton, anyway? Hillary doesn’t live among them, socialize with them, or have much else to do with them other than pandering for their vote.

I think it’s great that white liberals are getting shut out by their beloved minority voters. Minorities are going to toss these white liberals in the garbage like the trash they are. And it’s about time! Just ask John Edwards.

Barack Obama has taken a 10-point lead over Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, according to a new poll from Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby released today.

This is bad news. While Barack Obama is just as much of a socialist as Hillary Clinton, he is much cleaner and more intelligent than she could ever hope to be (which isn’t saying much).

Hillary Clinton’s only experience other than riding her husband’s coattails is coordinating smear campaigns against women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault and rape. Hillary has a lot of experience in this area. Obama doesn’t have any real scandals dogging his bid for the Presidency.

Obama isn’t filthy stinking rich like Hillary Clinton, or even John Edwards is. Most Democrat voters live their entire lives seething with jealously and rage over people who have nicer things and more money because they are more intelligent or harder working. Obama is closer to the “common man”, or at least the common Democrat-voting Neanderthal, than any of the other DFL candidates.

Obama is smarter, cleaner, and less wealthy than any of the other Democratic candidates battling it out in this 2008 election campaign. One would think that his closer proximity to the common Democratic Party voter would be helpful to him.

Many, if not most, Republicans were hoping that Hillary would win the nomination just for the simple fact that she is unlikeable and her idiocy would likely be her downfall. Unfortunately, she couldn’t keep her stupidity under wraps and torpedoed her own campaign before securing the nomination for which she has long been the odds-on favorite to win. Damn that Hillary!

Add Rudy Giuliani to the latest list of people predicting a Clinton-Obama DFL ticket for the 2008 election.

This pairing does make sense given the anti-white male mentality of liberals, which comprise the most vocal component of the Democratic constituency. However, what possible benefit would it have for the DFL’s chances of winning in 2008? The Democratic Party already has a solid lock on the black vote, regularly capturing 85% - 90%. So there isn’t any benefit there.

There’s always the “rock star” aspect of Barack Obama that could be beneficial to Hillary Clinton among unthinking, star struck voters. Obama has a bigger following with Hollywood phonies than Hillary does and they love to stump for their causes.

But if we look at this logically, we find that Barack Obama is cleaner than Hillary Clinton. He doesn’t have the legacy of scandals and failures that Hillary has. He doesn’t have the phony marriage and constantly cheating spouse to drag him down. He didn’t vote for the Iraq War because he wasn’t around to, so he doesn’t need to lie and pretend he was mislead or claim to have voted for something entirely different.

And Obama is much more intelligent than Hillary Clinton, too, which really isn’t saying much. He’s a good orator, even if what he says is nothing but superficial fluff and unrealistic, unattainable promises.

If anyone should be the running mate in this pairing, it is Hillary.

But is it possible that some white male Democrats could feel excluded by such a ticket? Will Muslims and other male-centric cultures vote for a female president? Only time will tell.

The main reason that the Democratic Party has any support is because of their never-ending promises to steal money from the people who earn it and give it to the people who didn’t.

At a campaign stop in Illinois, Barack Obama claimed that the Iraq War is preventing America from addressing its “needs”. Everything is a need or a right to these DFLers. Obama then promised action on low wages, health care, affordable college education, and retirement security as if he’s some kind of Superman who can defy the laws of economics and make all these things magically happen.

But how much is this going to cost? How much will it cost the taxpayers? How much will it cost the economy in terms of lost economic activity and jobs? Why should a high school kid working a part-time job deserve a high wage? Why should any unskilled, uneducated Democrat-voting Neanderthal deserve a high wage?

Most Democrat voters aren’t very bright. It’s a fact. Democrat voting communities have the lowest academic achievement in the modernized world and those voters prove it every day. They aren’t going to be thinking about how their lives will be negatively impacted by the Democrats’ massive tax increases that will be required to pay for all the promises they are making. They won’t be thinking about this because they are either not smart enough to consider such things or they don’t care because they possess a “gimme gimme gimme” mentality whereby they deserve your money by virtue of their very existence.

Democrats pretend that all they will have to do is roll back the Bush tax cuts and that the additional revenue will be enough to pay for the hundreds of billions in new spending. The truth of the matter is that repealing the Bush tax cuts wouldn’t generate anywhere near enough money to cover the Democrat’s spending goals, particularly when you consider the negative economic impact tax increases have, leaving average, middle-class taxpayers and future generations on the hook for the bill.

After the Bush tax cuts federal tax revenues actually increased. Why? Because more money in the pockets of the people who earn it means more spending which means more jobs which means more earnings which are taxed.

But don’t try explaining that to a Democrat voter. Appealing to Democrats with simple logic is like trying to teach a dog how to talk; it just isn’t going to happen.

One more thing: if Democrats are so concerned about the high cost of college education, then why is it that the most liberal institutions of higher learning in this country have the highest tuition?

See how idiotic these Democrats are?

The catfight between Hillary Clinton’s camp and the Barack Obama camp continues.

The origin of this typical Democrat silliness is the Youtube debate from a few nights ago where Barack Obama said that he would be willing to pander to leaders of hostile nations by meeting with them.

The Clinton camp is saying that Obama is naive for his willingness to meet with rogue leaders. The Obama camp snorted back that Hillary Clinton would maintain the Bush status quo with regard to international diplomacy.

John Edwards, meanwhile, is demonstrating his self-serving nature by using this spat to his advantage. Edwards said:

If you’re looking for what’s wrong in Washington, why the system is broken, one perfect example is what’s been happening over the last four days. We’ve had two good people, Democratic candidates for president, who’ve spent their time attacking each other instead of attacking the problems facing our country.

Perhaps these DFLers should get back to their master plan for America: the confiscation of more wealth from hardworking Americans and complete pandering to terrorists, life-long welfare recipients, and convicted felons.

(Article)

Democrats are shameless panderers, aren’t they? They’ve got no pride, no dignity, nothing–just bullshit and meaningless platitudes.

Barack Obama groveled before union members today (or will…), promising that he’ll stand beside them if he is elected president. Obama spewed more mental poison–the typical Democrat tripe: inequality, everybody is out to get you, I’m the only one who can save you, yada yada yada.

Let’s look at some of Barack Obama’s “genius”, shall we?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070721/ap_on_el_pr/obama_labor

We are facing a Washington that has thrown open its doors to the most anti-union, anti-worker forces we’ve seen in generations…

Despite record low unemployment, rising exports, and rising worker incomes, evil Georgie Bush be out to get you.

What we need to make real today is the idea that in this country we value the labor of every American.

Only I, Barack Obama, can give you strength for you are weak and powerless and incapable of being anything other than a peon on your own. You cannot live without me!

I stood on the picket line and marched with workers at the Congress Hotel in Chicago last week. I had marched with them four years earlier and I told them when I left that if they were still fighting four years from now, I’d be back on that picket line as president of the United States.

I stand beside you, lowly scum. Be thankful you have me because without me, Barack Obama, you are nothing!

When I talk about hope, when I talk about change, when I talk about holding America up to its ideals of opportunity and equality, this isn’t just the rhetoric of a campaign for me, it’s been the cause of a life — a cause I will work for and fight for every day as your president.

I will make sure equality exists…by taking all of your money and giving it to someone else! Only I can tell you what equality is and is not. I am your savior, your messiah, I am Barack Obama the Great!

Vote for me and I will make sure that your jobs are safe–by raising taxes so high as to make American production unprofitable and unrewarding. Then, you’ll really need me as your jobs fly overseas so fast all you’ll see is a blur.

Hmmm, I wonder what Barack Obama has to offer to intelligent, successful people. Oh, I already know: absolutely nothing but more wealth confiscation.

Yeah, I think I’ll support Barack Obama so he can steal more of what I’ve worked so hard for…

Intelligent, hard-working Americans have absolutely no use for the Democratic Party; the DFL is only a barrier to achieving your dreams.

Oprah Winfrey is going to host a big-money fundraiser for Illinois Senator Barack Obama at her Santa Barbara, CA, mansion in September. The minimum price to get in is $2,300; if you can bring $50,000 in funds, you can stay for dinner.

So much for the Democrats being for the “poor and downtrodden”, huh? The fact is Democrats pander to the underclass because they need the votes to get elected. But Democrat elites shut out those poor, unclean Democrat voters every chance they get. The poor are nothing more than pawns in the big-money DFL machine.

All these Democrats are frauds. Barack Obama is nothing more than a whore to big money–Big Hollywood money, in particular. Obama will be happy to shuck ‘n’ jive for you, if you’ve got the money to donate, that is. And Oprah, you remember how she cried about racism because a store in France wouldn’t let her in after hours? She’s a crybaby fraud. Enough said about Oprah.

The entertainment industry is full of phonies. They are people who earn their livings pretending to be something they are not. So it isn’t surprising that this fraud carries over to their everyday lives. Their devotion to Barack Obama is puzzling to many. Obama is as lacking in substance as one can possibly get. He gives flowery speeches that appeal to unthinking idiots. But he never elaborates on how he is going to implement–or pay for–his massive social programs. Obama is style over substance, which is why he appeals to Big Hollywood frauds. Obama is an empty suit if ever there was one.

Oprah Winfrey is an uppity Oreo. She doesn’t want anything to do with her black brethren. She surely isn’t going to invite black ghetto dwellers to her fancy mansion, is she? No, of course not.

There may be some black faces at Oprah’s fundraiser. But they’ll be bussing tables and sweeping the floor.

By the way, how much “global warming” causing carbon dioxide is going to be emitted into the atmosphere by Oprah and her rich buddies in the course of this unnecessary fundraiser?

Yes, all these Democrats are dirty frauds and liars. Each and every one. You see, these wealthy Democrats are entitled to their money and have the right to pollute at massive levels. But you and I, the lowly working stiffs, we don’t. We must live our lives the way they tell us. Just ask Al Gore.