Sheryl Crow is the quintessential liberal: she is a total and complete fraud.

Ms. Crow has been an outspoken advocate for action on global warming. She even went so far as to propose limitations on the amount of toilet paper people should use every time they use the toilet. She and her buddy, Laurie David, harassed Karl Rove about global warming at the 2007 White House Correspondents Dinner, in typical low class liberal fashion.

Sheryl Crow is now on a world tour. That’s right, she cares so much about global warming that she’s flying all over the world promoting her new album and going on a concert tour. Over 50 dates have been scheduled as of this writing in the United States, Canada, England, Scotland, Germany, France, and other countries.

How is Ms. Crow going to get to all those places? Will the travels of herself and her entourage and equipment create carbon dioxide emissions? Yes they will.

Sheryl Crow hit it big well over a decade ago. She must have amassed a fortune of tens-of-millions of dollars from her royalties and previous tours by now. She’s already rich. She doesn’t need to make more money. But that won’t stop her from creating tons of pollution so she can travel around singing her crappy songs.

Planes, tour buses, hotel rooms, fans driving to the stadium–we are talking about massive amounts of global warming causing pollution being released into the atmosphere because of this tour. And all of it is completely unnecessary. Society would continue to function just fine if Ms. Crow didn’t tour.

Ms. Crow thinks that average folks like you and me should do more about global warming up to and including paying punitive carbon taxes. But her actions speak louder than her meaningless words.

Sheryl Crow’s top ticket prices are around $80 in many cities. To further demonstrate what a complete liberal fraud she is, she is donating a whopping $1 from each ticket sale to the UN World Food program. What will she do with the other $79 per ticket? After paying expenses, I suspect the rest of it will go into her already bulging bank account.

It’s a good thing we have Ms. Crow and her incredibly inflated sense of self importance to tell us to pollute less while she goes on a world tour. We should all do exactly as she says, not as she does. Right?

It looks like the days are numbered for that murderer Ted Kennedy.

Kennedy, a Democratic Party Senator from Massachusetts, killed a young woman in 1969. He was driving drunk when his car went off a bridge. Kennedy, a typical liberal, was only concerned for his own well-being and left his passenger Mary Jo Kopechne to die. I’ll never understand why Kennedy wasn’t charged and put in prison where he belonged.

Ted Kennedy was one of the most liberal Senators. And as is typical of liberals, he was a total and complete fraud.

Kennedy lived a life of wealth and privilege. He lived off his daddy’s money. His father, Joseph Kennedy, amassed a fortune as the result of criminal enterprise. The elder Kennedy was a liquor bootlegger and stock market manipulator. Ted Kennedy always spoke out on behalf of the poor, but never hesitated to enjoy the luxuries that his dirty money could provide him.

Teddy had a couple of seizures last week. Today it was reported that he has a malignant (cancerous) brain tumor, with a poor prognosis. He’s 76-years-old, so it isn’t as if he hasn’t lived a full life, because he has. He is at the end of his life expectancy, anyway, unlike Mary Jo Kopechne, who died at the youthful age of 28 at the hand of Ted Kennedy.

Ted Kennedy: you rot in hell you murdering hypocrite pig.

Ted Kennedy Killed Mary Jo Kopechne

Ted Kennedy Brain Cancer Story

Do you think Ted Kennedy will apologize for murdering that woman? Or does he lack a conscience like most liberals?

Multi-millionaire musician Bruce Springsteen has endorsed Barack Obama for President. Springsteen, who hasn’t had a real job or an economic concern for nearly 35 years now, thinks that Obama is the right person to tackle the “important” issues of economic injustice and the environment. Springsteen said about Obama on his official website:

He speaks to the America I’ve envisioned in my music for the past 35 years, a generous nation with a citizenry willing to tackle nuanced and complex problems, a country that’s interested in its collective destiny and in the potential of its gathered spirit. A place where “…nobody crowds you, and nobody goes it alone.”

At the moment, critics have tried to diminish Senator Obama through the exaggeration of certain of his comments and relationships. While these matters are worthy of some discussion, they have been ripped out of the context and fabric of the man’s life and vision, so well described in his excellent book, Dreams From My Father, often in order to distract us from discussing the real issues: war and peace, the fight for economic and racial justice, reaffirming our Constitution, and the protection and enhancement of our environment.

Over here on E Street, we’re proud to support Obama for President.

Wow, how poetic…

Yes, another rich, pampered Democrat entertainer has endorsed his favorite candidate because he thinks that people are going to care what he thinks. As if being a rich songwriter makes him some kind of authority or something.

Springsteen is known for his songs about the struggles of working class Americans. Let’s take a quick look at what an outrageous hypocrite Springsteen is and just how out of touch he is with everyday working Americans.

Springsteen is currently on a world tour. Ticket prices range from $65 for crappy nosebleed seats to $95 for the main floor. Selling 15,000 seats at an average price of $80 would generate gross revenue of $1.2 million, with about 85% - 95% of that amount going to Springsteen. Then there are t-shirt sales at $25 a pop, posters, CDs, and whatever else the Springsteen machine sells, all intended to extract as much money from his fans as possible.

Does Springsteen ever consider that maybe his working class fans–the people he writes songs about–might find it difficult to afford $95 for a two-and-a-half hour concert? If Springsteen is concerned about economic justice, as his endorsement indicates, why does he charge so much money to attend his concerts? Furthermore, why doesn’t he give his millions away to reduce the economic inequality between him and his fans–or the rest of America?

Springsteen also seems concerned about the environment. Why then does an already extremely wealthy man need to go on tour and make even more money? Band members, roadies, managers, members of the entourage, and others have to be transported and housed. Jets, buses, limousines, electricity for the show–all will be used and all will create pollution that is completely unnecessary. And we are talking about massive amounts of pollution. It wouldn’t surprise me if the pollution generated as the result of one night’s performance exceeded the pollution generated by an average American family in an entire year.

The country would do just fine if Springsteen decided not to tour ever again. So if Springsteen is so concerned about economic justice and the environment, his rationale for endorsing Obama, then why is he guilty of being a big violator of the very issues he pretends to care so much about?

Bruce Springsteen is just another in a long line of self-important liberal frauds and hypocrites who thinks he knows what is best for the rest of us. Sorry, Bruce, you don’t know anything about the working class nor ordinary Americans. Your slovenly physical appearance doesn’t compensate for your actions and fools no one. Now go shave and put on some decent clothes more suited to a man of your extreme wealth.

This is so sweet! The current governor of the state of New York, and former state Attorney General, Eliot Spitzer, has been implicated in a upscale prostitution ring. Spitzer is a typical Democrat: he is a phony. While he pretended to play the role of a crusader for law and justice, he is in actuality nothing more than a liar and whore monger.

Bloomberg News Story

Governor Spitzer is a married man with three children. He prosecuted prostitution rings as Attorney General, now he is implicated as a customer in one. Perhaps he should change his name to John Spitzer.

Bill Clinton, former president, has released a new book entitled “Giving: How Each of Us Can Change the World”.

What’s Bill Clinton doing to change the world other than contributing large amounts of global warming-causing carbon dioxide by flying all over the world so he can make himself even richer by giving speeches at $100,000 per?

Bill Clinton is a typical liberal fraud. He has millions of dollars sitting in the bank and invested in corporations that he could give away to help others. He could give 100% of his money away and still be a rich man, as he and his wife Hillary are entitled to a couple hundred thousand dollars per year in pension income from their government jobs–many times more than the average American makes. But he doesn’t give his money away. Instead, he lives a life of wealth and luxury and releases a book telling others to do what he himself will not do.

Every liberal is a fraud and a hypocrite. Rich liberals, like Bill Clinton, are the worst of the worst. They tell others how to live but refuse to practice what they preach. Unfortunately, the typical liberal isn’t smart enough to see the hypocrisy of these liberal elites for what it is. So they continue to politically support and throw their money at these rich liberals who probably are laughing all the way to the bank at their gullible liberal supporters.

Giving? Bill Clinton has $50 million dollars he could give away to the “poor” he pretends to care so much about. But he never will. He will keep his wealth while doing everything he can to make it as difficult as possible for ordinary, average Americans to accumulate wealth as he has done.

The answer is: YES!

Whether it is multi-millionaire liberals like Al Gore flying all over the world generating huge amounts of global warming causing pollution to give presentations at $100,000 a pop, or rich Democrats whining that enough isn’t being done to help the poor while not giving their own money away, each and every left-winger is a fraud.

I don’t know which is worse, rich Democrats or environmentalist frauds.

You see, every liberal who cares about global warming who reads this is a fraud. Where do they think the electricity comes from to power their computers? They care about global warming, but they are wasting electricity playing on the internet?

Al Gore is now claiming that any dissent in the scientific community regarding global warming is the result of a campaign of disinformation funded by polluters. Gore said the following:

There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10 million a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community. In actuality, there is very little disagreement.”

Where does Al Gore get his information? What is his source for his $10 million claim? This sounds like Hillary Clinton’s “vast right-wing conspiracy” theory of several years ago.

Al Gore is one of the largest individual polluters in the world! Gore lives in three mansions, one of which uses 20 times the amount of energy as the average American home! Gore, an already-filthy-stinking-rich man, flies all over the world–sometimes in massively-polluting private jets–giving presentations about global warming–and charging $100,000 - $175,000 for an hour-and-a-half of work!

What an absolute fraud! How can any brain-dead fool support Al Gore or believe anything he says given his nauseating hypocrisy?

Al Gore doesn’t need to fly all over the world giving slideshow presentations about climate change–not in our information age. Anything he could possibly say could be said on a website.

Gore flies all over the world pumping thousands of pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere with each trip so he can make himself even richer. The personal appearance is the reason Gore gets paid, not the “information” he shares.

Gore and all this global warming nonsense is about money ($$$). Gore wants to make as much of it as possible. Democrats want to steal it from taxpayers. The notion of global warming is the means to an end for these dirty frauds and liars.

Follow the money and you’ll find the true motivation behind this global warming hysteria.

Check out Al Gore in his home office (from Time). How much CO2 goes into the atmosphere to power those four giant monitors?

How the hell can any thinking person give any credibility to anything Al Gore says? The man is a fraud!

I was just perusing the advertising rates of some liberal nutjob blogs this morning and it really amazed me as to what shameless, money-grubbing slimeballs these left-wingers are. These people are enriching themselves with lies and conspiracy theories and laughing all the way to the bank.

Liberals advocate stealing money from people who earn it at every turn. They criticize the rich, demonize them, and accuse them of all sorts of hypothetical corruption from raping the working class to keeping this person or that group down. They criticize oil companies for making huge profits. They criticize the high cost of food, housing, medical care, and pretty much everything in our capitalistic system. But when it comes down to it, liberals are trying to make as much money–for themselves–as they possibly can. And they are doing it while attempting to tear down the very system that allows them to make so much money. (Hypocritical? You bet. But, it is just one example of how irrational liberals truly are.)

Liberal money-makers must laugh at the gullible fools they make their money from.

Let’s take a look at some advertising rates on liberal/socialist/rich-people-suck blogs:

Talking Points Memo: $10,000 per week for premium ad, less for other page locations

DailyKos: $9,000 per week for a standard first-slot ad, less for ads further down on the page

The Raw Story: $8,000 per week for top-left spot, less for other page locations

Crooks And Liars: $1,995 per week for a standard ad, $4,600 for a one-week high-rise ad

As you can clearly see, liberal bloggers are money-grubbing frauds. They make a ton of money for telling people that you and I shouldn’t be able to keep the money we earn.

Whether it is Al Gore polluting like crazy flying all over the world in private jets to make money from speaking engagements, Barbara Streisand charging $450 for a concert ticket while criticizing Republicans for not helping the poor, Michael Moore charging $40,000 to tell poor college kids about the horrors of rich people, John Edwards charging $55,000 to talk about poverty for an hour, or Al Franken demanding a $2 million annual salary for a radio show nobody listens to, each and every single liberal on this planet is a fraud.

This leads me to one question: how stupid must you be to be a liberal?

Oprah Winfrey is going to host a big-money fundraiser for Illinois Senator Barack Obama at her Santa Barbara, CA, mansion in September. The minimum price to get in is $2,300; if you can bring $50,000 in funds, you can stay for dinner.

So much for the Democrats being for the “poor and downtrodden”, huh? The fact is Democrats pander to the underclass because they need the votes to get elected. But Democrat elites shut out those poor, unclean Democrat voters every chance they get. The poor are nothing more than pawns in the big-money DFL machine.

All these Democrats are frauds. Barack Obama is nothing more than a whore to big money–Big Hollywood money, in particular. Obama will be happy to shuck ‘n’ jive for you, if you’ve got the money to donate, that is. And Oprah, you remember how she cried about racism because a store in France wouldn’t let her in after hours? She’s a crybaby fraud. Enough said about Oprah.

The entertainment industry is full of phonies. They are people who earn their livings pretending to be something they are not. So it isn’t surprising that this fraud carries over to their everyday lives. Their devotion to Barack Obama is puzzling to many. Obama is as lacking in substance as one can possibly get. He gives flowery speeches that appeal to unthinking idiots. But he never elaborates on how he is going to implement–or pay for–his massive social programs. Obama is style over substance, which is why he appeals to Big Hollywood frauds. Obama is an empty suit if ever there was one.

Oprah Winfrey is an uppity Oreo. She doesn’t want anything to do with her black brethren. She surely isn’t going to invite black ghetto dwellers to her fancy mansion, is she? No, of course not.

There may be some black faces at Oprah’s fundraiser. But they’ll be bussing tables and sweeping the floor.

By the way, how much “global warming” causing carbon dioxide is going to be emitted into the atmosphere by Oprah and her rich buddies in the course of this unnecessary fundraiser?

Yes, all these Democrats are dirty frauds and liars. Each and every one. You see, these wealthy Democrats are entitled to their money and have the right to pollute at massive levels. But you and I, the lowly working stiffs, we don’t. We must live our lives the way they tell us. Just ask Al Gore.

Democrat presidential contender John Edwards started a multi-state poverty tour a couple of days ago to shine a spotlight on poverty in America. Edwards is going to regale the impoverished with his $1,250 haircut.

Unbelievable! It’s unbelievable that any thinking human being can support a man who is such a blatant fraud and hypocrite. Every single time that I think a Democrat can’t sink any lower in the fraud and hypocrisy department, one exceeds my wildest expectations.

Judge a man not by his words, but by his deeds. OK, let’s judge John Edwards:

• He got rich by filing frivolous lawsuits against doctors
• He lives a lavish lifestyle of wealth and luxury, indulging his expensive tastes every chance he gets whether it is his 28,000 square foot mansion or $1,250 haircuts
• He says he cares about the poor, but doesn’t use his own riches to assist the impoverished

The verdict: John Edwards is a disgusting fraud and hypocrite.

John Edwards has reported assets of $30 million. He made $480,000 from a part-time job at a hedge fund (I didn’t know ambulance-chasing lawyers were financial experts). He also made $400,000 from giving speeches, mostly to college kids. (Recall that Edwards charged poor college kids $55,000 to give a speech about poverty. “Hey poor college kids: pay me, an already-rich Democrat, $55,000 and I’ll tell you about poverty for an hour!” )

Let’s say Edwards woke up one morning and decided that he was tired of being a hypocrite. Let’s say he decided to give the bulk of his wealth away to the poor. If he kept $2 million for himself, he could invest that in some high-quality corporate bonds and generate a pre-tax annual income of $100,000—enough for any family to live on and more than the majority of American families earn. Then he could donate $28 million to aid the poor he pretends to care so much about. If you assume a construction cost of $75,000 per housing unit for modest housing, enough units could be built with Edwards’ money to house over 370 impoverished families!!!

Don’t worry, Edwards will never use his own money to help the poor. Why not? Because he is a fraud, that’s why! He preaches one thing, and lives his life the exact opposite. Two Americas, Mr. Edwards? Which one are you living in? And in your world is everyone blind to your hypocrisy? Because in the real world we aren’t.

Forty-plus years of the War On Poverty has failed. Trillions of dollars have been stolen from those who earn it and given to those too lazy to earn it. What makes Edwards think that more of the same is going to do the trick?

Democrats never learn.

What causes poverty? Why are poor people poor? Democrats never discuss this. Most sensible people already know the answer, however. More on this later…

John Edwards isn’t worthy of being president. He is a slimy lawyer who will do or say anything to get what he wants. He is pandering to the poor because they are the easiest group to win support from. All it takes is promises of more welfare freebies and stick-it-to-the-rich policies and they line up behind you.

This past weekend witnessed the latest propaganda attempt by Al Gore in his efforts to enrich himself by spreading unfounded hysteria and fear: Live Earth.

Apparently, having concerts all over the world that create unnecessary pollution which contributes (supposedly) to global warming is the proper thing to do to raise awareness in Gore’s twisted and limited mind. Much like a parent smoking pot to try to convince his children not to smoke pot, I guess…

How many thousands of tons of carbon dioxide were released into the atmosphere to fly the performers, their managers, roadcrew, and entourage around the world? How much pollution was created to generate the power for the lighting and sound systems? How many hundreds-of-thousands of concert-goers created pollution traveling to and from the concert sites?

Al Gore is a liberal fraud of the worst kind. He spreads hysteria and lies and positions himself to financially benefit from it. Al Gore is making money hand-over-fist from this global warming nonsense.

Unfortunately, left-wingers aren’t smart enough to see Gore for the fraud that he truly is. I mean, if it wasn’t enough that he flies around the world in private jets to give talks about global warming–for which he is handsomely compensated, and if it wasn’t enough that his one home used 20 times the amount of electricity as the average home, will a series of unnecessary, massively polluting concerts be enough to convince left-wingers of what a joke Al Gore is? I doubt it.

The next time I read an article from a star-struck liberal desperate for Gore to run for President because he is the only one who can save the world I am going to be sick.

Most of the reviews I’ve read of this flick have been superficial to a sickening degree. The reviewers don’t examine the premises of the movie; instead, they focus solely on the production quality and emotional effect it has on them, which, most likely, taps into their pre-existing biases.

This review by Kurt Loder is different–it looks at the opposing view. According to Loder, Moore portrays socialized medicine as a panacea without ever examining the truth behind most government-run healthcare programs: long waiting lists, shortages, and sub-par care.

In typical liberal fashion, Moore omits critical facts that completely contradict his ideas, if not outright destroys them. Moore, as do most left-wingers, relies on the emotional aspect to convey his message. Liberals and Democrats have faulty logical reasoning abilities, so the only way to reach them is with emotional pleas. Moore has made many tens-of-millions of dollars doing just that.

Loder mentions in his review that Michael Moore refers to Hillary Clinton as “sexy”. Moore probably thinks a plate of doughnuts is sexy. If Moore had any credibility at all, he certainly doesn’t after saying that.

I wonder if Moore touches on the impact of obesity on healthcare costs…

If you are considering seeing Michael Moore’s “Sicko”, give this review a read before you go. Then decide if you want to make an already wealthy liberal charlatan even richer with your hard-earned money.

(Link to review)

What can we say to describe Bono, lead singer of the rock group U2? Multi-millionaire. Liberal. Humanitarian. Nobel-prize nominee. Fraud.

For the past several years, Bono has been flying all over the world (pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere) badgering politicians of countries he considers wealthy, prodding them to give more money to help alleviate poverty in Africa. Bono has been especially critical of the United States of America.

But why doesn’t Bono give the bulk of his money to the poor in Africa? Does he genuinely care? Doesn’t he want to use his own wealth to help the Africans he pretends to care so much about?

Let’s look at a few facts about Bono.

Bono’s band, U2, charges upwards of $150 for prime tickets to their concerts (how can the poor afford that, Bono?), and can generate estimated gross revenue of $2 million per show. Bono spent $15 million to buy a swanky apartment in Manhattan in 2003, one of several lavish homes he has in several countries. Bono and his U2 band mates moved their publishing company from Ireland to the Netherlands so they could enjoy a lower tax rate on royalties, keeping more money for themselves (the rich get richer at taxpayer expense, eh, Bono?).

Bono has all this wealth that he could use–if he wanted to–to help poor Africans, but he doesn’t.

How many thousands of poor, starving Africans could be helped with Bono’s millions? How many Africans could be fed, clothed, housed, and protected from disease with the money Bono spent on just his lavish New York apartment alone? Doesn’t Bono care?

No, Bono doesn’t care. He is a typical liberal fraud who is more concerned about his own celebrity than whatever cause he latches onto to bolster his notoriety. He expects taxpayers in other countries to fork over their money to help Africa while he lives a life of wealth and luxury and engages in practices to enrich himself by paying less in taxes.

How do these liberal frauds look at themselves in the mirror? Bono is a truly disgusting hypocrite.

Do Democrat politicians really care about the poor? The answer is: NO!

How can we tell? Easy. Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Al Gore, John Kerry, and Ted Kennedy (and others) are all very wealthy. If they cared about the poor, they would give the bulk of their own money to the poor, save enough for a modest home similar to what most Americans live in. They would sacrifice their own wealth to help the poor–if they truly cared, that is. But none of them do.

It isn’t hard to give away money, is it? If you listen to these Democrats talk, there are people suffering everywhere. There are homeless who need to be housed and fed, people who can’t pay their medical bills, and on and on and on…

Yet all these Democrat hypocrites live a life of wealth and luxury despite the hardships of millions. Don’t they care?

Does John Edwards really need a $400 haircut? Couldn’t he get a $15 haircut and donate $385 to the poor he pretends to care so much about? Of course he could.

Does Hillary Clinton need her big fat bank account, investments, and book royalties? Are there not people who could be helped with her millions? Of course there are.

Does Al Gore need three giant homes that suck up energy like crazy and contribute to global warming at an alarming level? Couldn’t he sell two of his homes and donate that money to the poor he pretends to care so much about?

How many of these DFL elitists itemize their charitable contributions on their tax returns and end up paying less in taxes than they otherwise would? They want all of us to pay higher taxes, but they don’t want to pay those taxes themselves or part with that money voluntarily.

Democrats pander to the underclass by promising to steal money from those who earn it and give it to those who support them with votes. Democrats essentially buy votes with taxpayer money. It’s a racket. If those phony Democrats really cared, they would give up their lifestyles of wealth and excess and give their own money to those they claim to care about.

How many thousands of people could be helped with the cumulative wealth held by Clinton, Edwards, Gore, and Kerry? A lot of people could be helped with these DFLer’s wealth, no doubt about it. But people aren’t being helped because the Democrat frauds don’t believe in living their lives like they tell us we should live ours.

Democrat politicians do not care about the impoverished except for the votes they can get from them.