It looks like Hillary Clinton is $22.5 million in debt as a result of her losing campaign to be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee.

Clinton loaned her own personal money to her campaign to the tune of $12.2 million.  Now she is on her knees begging for others to repay the money she owes to vendors and herself.

How sad.  How pathetic.  How typically Democrat!

Hillary Clinton is rich.  She and her husband have reported assets in excess of $50 million.  They have grossed over $100 million in income since her husband left office.

Why doesn’t she pay off her own debt?  If she truly believed in her cause–which was herself–why wouldn’t she want to use her own money to support it?  Even after paying off this debt, she and her husband would still be multimillionaires.

Hillary Clinton is a woman who criticizes rich people and calls them greedy.  She extols wealth redistribution and economic equality.  But when it comes down to it, she is nothing more than a typical liberal hypocrite who wants to hold on to as much of her own money as possible while taking it away from everyone else.

If the Clintons are worth $50 million, Hillary could pay off this debt and still have $27 million left in the bank.  Awww, what’s the matter?  Can’t a rich liberal hypocrite live on only $27 million?  Not to mention the several hundred thousand they make per year off her senate salary and Bill’s pension?

Hillary Clinton did nothing but attack President Bush for “incompetence”.  But it looks like she can’t even manage her own money.  Who’s incompetent now, Hillary?

It has been reported by the LA Times that Hillary Clinton will end her campaign to be the Democratic Party Presidential nominee this Saturday and will endorse Barack Obama for the sake of party unity.

Party unity? This is the same party that tossed her aside like garbage. This is the party that treated her like a second class citizen. This is the party whose highest leadership turned their backs on her and endorsed her opponent long before the race was over and while she was winning state after state with huge margins over him. The position of the party leadership was in stark contrast to that of the rank and file DFL voter.

The only reason Barack Obama garnered so much support from Democratic Party leadership is because he is slick and new and they wanted to latch onto what they consider a rising star. The fact is that nobody really knows anything about him. He has no achievements to speak of, no significant legislation, and little experience. He does not have the critical track record which voters can use to find out who he really is. He has absolutely no qualifications to be the leader of the free world and commander of the United States military.

Most voters early in the race had no idea about his relationship with that crook Tony Rezko or his crooked real estate deal. Nor did they know about his membership in a black radical church. Or about his friendship and relationship with liberal terrorist William Ayers. Most younger voters are probably unaware that Obama is completely unoriginal, saying nothing that hasn’t been said before and going so far as plagiarizing from others. He is a manufactured political candidate, he is not the real deal.

Nobody really knows who Obama is. But we all know who Hillary Clinton is, for she has been under scrutiny for fifteen years compared to Obama’s six months. Despite that fact, the leadership of the Democratic Party abandoned Hillary and hitched their wagons to an unknown.

Backing an unknown entity and empty suit like Barack Obama is a huge political risk. Hopefully, it comes back to bite the Democrats in the future. For there is much still left to learn about Barack Hussein Obama, and with his thin resume, what we will learn in the future will not be favorable.

There is no question that Hillary Clinton is much more qualified to be President than Barack Obama is.

My hope was that Hillary Clinton would have turned her back on her party like they did to her and either run as a third party candidate or endorse John McCain. What’s wrong with Hillary? This is a woman who has been treated like a doormat by her husband for over 30 years, then she is treated like garbage by her party, which she has been a faithful supporter of for even longer.

Is Hillary Clinton suffering from battered woman’s syndrome in a figurative sense? No matter how badly she is treated by her partners, whether they be her husband or her party, she always comes back to them for more abuse.

Break the cycle, Hillary.

Now that Hillary’s political aspirations have not panned out, will she and her husband get divorced? That was the whole reason she stayed married to him all these years, wasn’t it?

Fox News projects Hillary Clinton the winner in Pennsylvania based on exit polling.

Fox News Pennsylvania Projection

Obama was projected to have received 89% of the black vote, and 61% of young voters. Who says that blacks are voting solely based on race?

There is no doubt that Hillary Clinton would be bad for America. She is a liar, a fraud, and a hypocrite socialist millionaire. Barack Obama, however, is all those things and more. His relationships with left-wing radicals should be enough to scare anyone with any sense at all away from him. And his crooked real estate deal with Tony Rezko proves he is one of the dirtiest politicians of the modern era.

But we are talking about Democrats…so there isn’t much sense to be found. If Democrat voters had any sense they wouldn’t be Democrats.

According to a new Suffolk University poll, Hillary Clinton has widened her lead over Barack Obama in the critical state of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Democrats will take to the polls tomorrow, April 22nd, 2008, to cast their votes for their preferred candidate.

Just last week it was reported that Clinton’s lead over Obama had dropped to between 5% and 6%. One must wonder if Obama’s dismal performance in last week’s ABC News debate has had any bearing on the latest poll numbers. Or, one must wonder if these polls are very accurate at all. I guess we’ll find out tomorrow night.

There has been a lot of press in recent weeks about prominent Democrats urging Hillary to drop out of the race. But if she does indeed win Pennsylvania, and if by double digits as the latest poll suggests, then why would she even consider dropping out?

It is a beautiful sight to see the way that prominent Democrats have turned their backs on Mrs. Clinton, particularly those who have been close to the Clintons. Just last week former Secretary of Labor under Bill Clinton, Robert Reich, announced his endorsement of Obama in another sign of just how eager Democrats are to throw the Clintons out with the garbage. Reich, as you may know, is as about as communist of a person as one can get.

The Democratic Party isn’t just fractured along racial or gender lines, it is fractured along the top and the bottom. Party leaders are backing Obama while many rank and file working class Democrats are backing Clinton. One can only hope that this disconnect between the leadership and the individuals who comprise the party’s base will be exploited by Republicans.

In the past, Hillary Clinton has demanded that troops start being withdrawn from Iraq in 90 days. Later, she refused to pledge that she would withdraw troops, said that the Democrats shouldn’t oversell the idea of withdrawals, and said that she would keep thousands of US troops in Iraq for years to come.

Now Hillary is claiming that she is the only one who will end the war–the war that she helped start. Hillary was quoted as saying:

One candidate will continue the war and keep the troops in Iraq indefinitely. One candidate only says he will end the war. And one candidate is ready, willing and able to end the war and to rebuild our military while honoring our soldiers and our veterans.

Sen. Obama on the other hand says he will end the war, but his top foreign policy adviser said he won’t necessarily follow the plan he has been talking about during this campaign, that his plan is just words. You can count on me to end the war safely and responsibly.

That one candidate being her, of course. Is she now finally making a firm pledge to withdraw troops, which she refused to do before? And for that one candidate who “only says he will end the war”, isn’t Hillary basically doing the same thing? Given her past record of flip-flops on Iraq, maybe she is the one who is who is full of empty rhetoric on the issue?

By the way, isn’t Hillary a wonder woman? Not only will she end the war, but she will also rebuild the military and honor soldiers. All that from just this one person? Simply amazing. I’ll guess I’ll have to consider voting for her…

Hillary must be getting really desperate to make unattainable promises like her latest to start withdrawing troops within 60 days should she be elected President. Next thing you know she’ll promise to travel back in time and withdraw the troops before they ever went in to Iraq.

Hillary is taking her last gasps. So sad. She had so many good opportunities for America…

How stupid do these Democrats think the American people are?

Hillary Clinton has been promoting her job creation plan recently, which really isn’t much of a plan at all. In a nutshell, she has proposed a $7 billion plan to persuade companies to not ship jobs overseas. Five billion of that amount would be for tax credits supposedly to help companies compete globally. Hillary Clinton was quoted as saying:

“Today I’m proposing one of the largest expansions of tax benefits for research and job growth in a generation,” she said. “We have to update our tools for rewarding innovation. The research-and-development tax credit, for example, has been a successful, cost-effective tool to increase investment in research jobs here in the United States. When I’m president, we will increase it by 50 percent.”

OK, great. Hillary has just proposed tax credits for big corporations, which she has been criticizing for years. But another question one must ask is this: why has Hillary not proposed such legislation while she has served in the Senate? If she thinks this is such a great idea, why didn’t she propose this years ago, or even more recently? And why didn’t she introduce the legislation to get the ball rolling?

The reason Mrs. Clinton didn’t do anything about this earlier is because she doesn’t believe in this kind of thing. She is interested in getting votes and will pander to anyone who wants to listen. In one speech she will rail against corporations and tax credits much like the ones she has proposed. Then in another speech she will completely contradict herself and propose the very thing she has been critical of in the past.

What’s even worse is that these Democrat troglodytes aren’t bright enough to not only see Hillary Clinton for the fraud she is, but they aren’t capable of realizing the detrimental effect her other proposals will have on business and industry.

Hillary has proposed mandatory employer-provided health insurance for all employees, even part-time flunkies. She has also proposed mandatory paid maternity leave for employees who have babies, starting first with federal government employees.

Then we must consider Hillary’s position that taxes on corporations and wealthy individuals must be raised, both income and investment taxes. How does raising taxes on investment returns encourage the investment necessary to create jobs? How does raising income taxes on those who actually do the investing and purchasing create jobs given that they have less money to spend on either? It doesn’t.

Nobody invests money to have the majority of it taken away from them. Taxes diminish investment returns. When investment returns decline, less investment takes place! Why the hell don’t these Democrats realize this?

All of these policies that Hillary has proposed increase the burden on employers and raise the cost of doing business in America. A few billion in tax credits won’t come close to offsetting the tens-of-billions in additional taxes and mandates that Hillary champions.

I won’t even get into the DFL’s desire to put carbon taxes on energy, which would raise the cost of doing business even more.

It seems like a twisted joke for Hillary to propose a jobs plan when she is also proposing policies that will destroy jobs. I just wish the Democratic Party’s voting base was smart enough to see this nonsense for what it truly is.

We have heard and read about all the prominent Democrats who have abandoned Hillary Clinton requesting that she drop out of the race despite her continued leads over Barack Obama in some key states. Yesterday Hillary reiterated her intention to continue the race, and she lied yet again. Mrs. Clinton was quoted as saying:

Let me tell you something, when it comes to finishing a fight, Rocky (Balboa from the fictional boxing movie “Rocky”) and I have a lot in common. I never quit. I never give up. And neither do the American people.

Is that so? Then why has Mrs. Clinton been demanding that we give up in Iraq and surrender to terrorists for a long time now?

A transcript of a speech Hillary Clinton gave in July, 2007, from Hillary’s own website:

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/speech/view/?id=2366

It is long past time that the president ended American combat involvement Iraq’s multi-sided, sectarian civil war, fought for power, revenge, and personal advantage.

That is what I have been trying to do in the Senate, after calling for and consistently voting for phased redeployment of our troops out of Iraq. That is why I voted against a bill to fund the war without any plan for ending it. That is why I’ve introduced legislation to begin bringing our troops home within 90 days. And that is why I am joining other Democrats to add provisions to the defense authorization bill — which we are debating in the Senate this week — that would force the President to change course in Iraq. Among those provisions is legislation I am sponsoring with Senator Robert Byrd to de-authorize the war — legislation that would actually end the President’s authority to fight it.

If that isn’t quitting, then what is?

Let’s be fair to Hillary for a moment. She has served as her husband’s doormat throughout their entire marriage. She’s been cheated on and lied to again and again. She hasn’t quit her marriage, though. Since the only reason she endured the decades of lies, cheating, and public humiliation her husband subjected her to was so she could run for President, it would mean that she wasted her entire life if she abandoned her ambitions now. And that would be a tough pill for anyone to swallow.

In case you are interested, the Who’s Dated Who website has a list of women Bill Clinton has supposedly bedded while married to Hillary. If you look, you will see that some are recent. I don’t know how accurate this Who’s Dated Who is, but the truth is that Hillary and Bill Clinton have a phony marriage, spending very little time together and showing no genuine affection for each other.

Bill Clinton At Who’s Dated Who

According to this article, nearly one-third of white Democrats think that Hillary Clinton is a phony.

Article

Still, Clinton, 60, has provided ammunition to opponents. She has insisted that she supported weapons inspections, not war, in Iraq in 2002, although she gave speeches that year advocating action against Saddam Hussein before voting to authorize the use of force.

GASP! Oh really?! These people are just figuring out that Hillary Clinton is a total and complete fraud? (But then again, so is Barack Obama, and just about every Democrat.)

The article discusses Hillary Clinton’s numerous flip-flops, resume embellishments, and outright lies. It goes on to say that in this information age anyone can hop online and find the truth about what a candidate did, said, or supported in the past. That is very true. Hillary Clinton’s lies can easily be revealed. Too bad she isn’t smart enough to figure that out.

In years past, Democrats relied on their voting base to believe anything they said. Today, a large proportion still do. But in this highly contested race for the Democratic Party nomination, journalists are going to be scrutinizing each candidate more closely than they otherwise would, meaning that anything from the past–no matter how big or small–that contradicts what the candidate is saying today is going to get attention and be disseminated to the masses.

Hillary Clinton is her own worst enemy.

Everywhere you look, prominent Democrats are turning their backs on Hillary Clinton and embracing Barack Obama.

Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey has announced that he is going to endorse Obama.

Why are all these DFLers shunning the Clintons? What did the Clintons do to deserve such treatment? They are the same dirty frauds and liars they were five, ten, and fifteen years ago. So what changed?

Is it possible that all the leaders of the Democratic Party have gotten themselves swept up in Obamamania? Are they moved by Obama’s empty platitudes and elevated speaking voice? Have they completely ignored the fact that Obama is bought and paid for by a Muslim businessman under indictment, Tony Rezko?

What did Hillary do to cause so many people whom she thought were her friends to abandon her? Somebody should investigate this and write a book about it.

Democrats for years have bemoaned campaign contributions from corporate and wealthy interests. But it turns out that the Democrats have been the largest beneficiaries of Wall Street contributions this campaign season, with Barack Obama leading the way.

Today Obama criticized Wall Street and business in general for its “ethic of greed” in contributing to the foreclosure crisis. Meanwhile, Obama has been taking in cash hand over fist from these very same people he now criticizes.

So, why is Obama criticizing a group of people while taking in huge campaign contributions from them? Doesn’t Obama realize that this “ethic of greed” he criticizes is what allowed those people to make the money that they are giving to him?

Obama has taken in $6.7 million from investment and securities firms. Hillary Clinton has received $6.6 million. John McCain, to contrast, has only received about $3 million.

If Obama and Hillary feel so strongly that Wall Street has acted in a manner detrimental to their voting base, why are they taking the money? Shouldn’t they give it back?

The fact of the matter is that these Democrats–all of them–are nothing but frauds, phonies, and liars. They hobnob with the rich and famous. They attend fancy parties, drink the finest champagne, and dine on the finest food. They travel by private jet and limousine. They are far removed from the common man. Yet, when they need some votes, they spout their populist rhetoric and the Democrat voters lap it up. And when they need money, they are more than happy to take it from the very people they pretend to be against.

Yahoo Article

A new poll shows that Hillary Clinton’s likability has dropped recently. Forty-eight percent of poll respondents had a negative view of Clinton; only 37% viewed her positively.

Is anybody surprised? If her husband liked her, would he cheat on her constantly and do so to this very day? Probably not.

Nobody likes Hillary. Not ever her husband, Bill.

What can Hillary do to make herself more likable? Maybe she should bake some cookies. It’s obvious that people don’t like her for her personality or her ideas.

There was a great syndicated article the other day written by Shailagh Murray and Jonathan Weisman of the Washington Post that demonstrates just what kind of dirty frauds and liars Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are. Despite having absolutely no accomplishments of their own to speak of during their scant careers, both Clinton and Obama are positioning themselves to take credit for legislation they had no part of creating.

Here’s a recent example from the article:

Just this week, as the financial markets were roiling in the wake of the Bear Stearns collapse, Obama made another claim that was greeted with disbelief in some corners of Capitol Hill. On March 13, Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, unveiled legislative proposals to allow the Federal Housing Administration to guarantee new loans from banks willing to help homeowners in or approaching foreclosure. Obama and Clinton were in Washington for a day-long round of budget voting, but neither appeared at the housing news conference.

Yet Obama on Monday appeared to seek top billing on Dodd’s proposal.

“At this moment, we must come together and act to address the housing crisis that set this downturn in motion and continues to eat away at the public’s confidence in the market,” Obama said. “We should pass the legislation I put forward with my colleague Chris Dodd to create meaningful incentives for lenders to buy or refinance existing mortgages so that Americans facing foreclosure can keep their homes.”

Dodd did say that Obama supported the bill, as does Clinton. But he could not offer pride of authorship to the candidate he wants to see in the White House next year.

Can you believe the gall of Barack Obama? Does he really think that the people will never discover the truth?

If Barack Obama spent as much time actually working on behalf of the people as he does plagiarizing speeches he would be a very productive politician.

Ah, Hillary Clinton. So many qualifications to be Commander in Chief… Yes, she sure has a lot of experience–at doing nothing.

In order to portray herself as ready for the position of President, Hillary tends to exaggerate her experience. Unless, of course, it’s about something negative, then she had nothing to do with it.

Some people actually believe her.

Now Hillary has been caught red-faced in a lie. Not a little white lie, not an embellishment, an outright lie. Mrs. Clinton said last week during a speech that she came under sniper fire while on a diplomatic trip to Bosnia in March of 1996. Hillary was quoted as saying:

“I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”

Not only does that statement contradict what Hillary herself wrote in her own book, but it is the exact opposite of what really happened. Hillary didn’t have to run with her head down. She is seen in a Youtube video smiling and shaking hands as she and her party stood on the tarmac.

What a liar!

Here’s a video on Youtube of Hillary making the statements and video from the Bosnia trip.

Video

Who in their right mind could support a liar and fraud like Hillary Clinton?

Hillary Clinton has finally lost the support of African-American Democrat supporters. According to a new CNN poll, 59% of black Democrats now back Barack Obama, giving him a 28-point lead over Mrs. Clinton. Just three months ago Hillary Clinton had a 24-point lead over Obama. My, how things have changed.

Why would black people support a rich white woman like Hillary Clinton, anyway? Hillary doesn’t live among them, socialize with them, or have much else to do with them other than pandering for their vote.

I think it’s great that white liberals are getting shut out by their beloved minority voters. Minorities are going to toss these white liberals in the garbage like the trash they are. And it’s about time! Just ask John Edwards.

Barack Obama has taken a 10-point lead over Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, according to a new poll from Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby released today.

This is bad news. While Barack Obama is just as much of a socialist as Hillary Clinton, he is much cleaner and more intelligent than she could ever hope to be (which isn’t saying much).

Hillary Clinton’s only experience other than riding her husband’s coattails is coordinating smear campaigns against women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault and rape. Hillary has a lot of experience in this area. Obama doesn’t have any real scandals dogging his bid for the Presidency.

Obama isn’t filthy stinking rich like Hillary Clinton, or even John Edwards is. Most Democrat voters live their entire lives seething with jealously and rage over people who have nicer things and more money because they are more intelligent or harder working. Obama is closer to the “common man”, or at least the common Democrat-voting Neanderthal, than any of the other DFL candidates.

Obama is smarter, cleaner, and less wealthy than any of the other Democratic candidates battling it out in this 2008 election campaign. One would think that his closer proximity to the common Democratic Party voter would be helpful to him.

Many, if not most, Republicans were hoping that Hillary would win the nomination just for the simple fact that she is unlikeable and her idiocy would likely be her downfall. Unfortunately, she couldn’t keep her stupidity under wraps and torpedoed her own campaign before securing the nomination for which she has long been the odds-on favorite to win. Damn that Hillary!

Everything about Hillary Clinton is phony. Her marriage is phony. Both she and her husband live separate lives, except for political appearances. Her stance on the war is phony. She demands troop withdrawals one day and refuses to pledge to withdraw troops herself should she be elected president. Her compassion for the poor is phony, too, as evidenced by her massive wealth, which she doesn’t give away to help the poor.

It was revealed, much to the dismay of the Hillary Clinton camp, that senior campaign staffers pulled aside audience members at a recent appearance and requested they ask certain questions to make Mrs. Clinton appear more favorable.

The only way Mrs. Clinton can avoid appearing the idiot that she is is to have pre-selected questions asked so she can rehearse ahead of time.

How shameful. How typically Democrat.

(Story)

The battle for Iowa has taken a turn in Hillary Clinton’s favor. Mrs. Clinton has captured the lead from John Edwards and now has the support of 29% of respondents in a recent poll. Edwards dropped from 29% in May to 23% now. Barack Obama sits at 22%.

It has been known for many years that Hillary Clinton would be the nominee when she ran for President; it was known she would run for President, too. Well, we Conservatives and Republicans knew it. Perhaps the intellectually challenged people who comprise the Democrat voter base didn’t know it, but we did.

The 2008 election will be about the swing voters, as have the past few presidential elections. Will swing voters turn a blind eye to Hillary Clinton’s hypocrisy and support for the War in Iraq like her liberal supporters have? Will they overlook her numerous flip-flops? What will they think of Hillary’s demand that troops start being withdrawn from Iraq in 90 days, but her refusal to promise that she would withdraw troops by 2013?

By definition, 50% of the population is of below average intelligence. The vast majority of those dimwits vote for the Democratic Party. I have to hope that enough swing voters are smart enough to see Hillary Clinton for the lying, hypocritical fraud that she is. Otherwise, we are all doomed.

Add Rudy Giuliani to the latest list of people predicting a Clinton-Obama DFL ticket for the 2008 election.

This pairing does make sense given the anti-white male mentality of liberals, which comprise the most vocal component of the Democratic constituency. However, what possible benefit would it have for the DFL’s chances of winning in 2008? The Democratic Party already has a solid lock on the black vote, regularly capturing 85% - 90%. So there isn’t any benefit there.

There’s always the “rock star” aspect of Barack Obama that could be beneficial to Hillary Clinton among unthinking, star struck voters. Obama has a bigger following with Hollywood phonies than Hillary does and they love to stump for their causes.

But if we look at this logically, we find that Barack Obama is cleaner than Hillary Clinton. He doesn’t have the legacy of scandals and failures that Hillary has. He doesn’t have the phony marriage and constantly cheating spouse to drag him down. He didn’t vote for the Iraq War because he wasn’t around to, so he doesn’t need to lie and pretend he was mislead or claim to have voted for something entirely different.

And Obama is much more intelligent than Hillary Clinton, too, which really isn’t saying much. He’s a good orator, even if what he says is nothing but superficial fluff and unrealistic, unattainable promises.

If anyone should be the running mate in this pairing, it is Hillary.

But is it possible that some white male Democrats could feel excluded by such a ticket? Will Muslims and other male-centric cultures vote for a female president? Only time will tell.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was booed by liberals at the annual Yearly Kos convention. Yearly Kos is a convention put on by radical extremist liberals from the liberal nutjob blog Daily Kos. Daily Kos is a blog by socialists (progressives, they call themselves) intent on destroying America’s capitalist economy by extreme wealth confiscation, high taxes, and cradle-to-grave welfare benefits for anyone and everyone unwilling to work to support themselves.

Interestingly, Daily Kos has some of the highest advertising rates for blogs around and has tons of advertisements on its homepage. They also have sponsors for their convention.

You see, liberals–all liberals–are frauds who preach wealth redistribution and scorn for the rich while attempting to make as much money for themselves as they can. Daily Kos (and the scumbag who founded it) is no exception.

Clinton was booed, according to news reports, because she would not pledge to refuse campaign contributions from lobbyists. Of course Clinton wouldn’t make such a pledge. If she did, she might have to dip into her own wealth (estimated at $50 million) to help finance her campaign. Rich liberals are great at taking and spending other people’s money, but they keep a firm grip on their own.

Daily Kos guru Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, said, “We may decide she’s not our first choice, but she’s not a bad choice.”

The fact that anti-war liberal nutjobs like the people at Daily Kos would ignore Hillary Clinton’s adamant support for the war and throw their backing to her was a given. Liberals have no guiding principles at all.

All these liberal nuts want is to feel powerful by seeing which presidential candidates will grovel before them the most. It’s funny to think how important these left-wing troglodytes must feel when the entire DFL presidential field flies in to grovel before them as they did at Yearly Kos. (And spewing massive amounts of “global warming” causing pollution into the atmosphere at the same time.)

Hillary will get on her hands and knees and pander to anyone at anytime. Hillary Clinton’s original support for the war is of no consequence. What matters is that she is on her hands and knees groveling before the liberal nuts; they are getting what they want.

If Hillary spent as much time on her hands and knees for her husband (Bill Clinton–remember him?) as she does for anti-war kooks and socialists, maybe her husband wouldn’t have cheated on her all throughout their phony marriage!

The catfight between Hillary Clinton’s camp and the Barack Obama camp continues.

The origin of this typical Democrat silliness is the Youtube debate from a few nights ago where Barack Obama said that he would be willing to pander to leaders of hostile nations by meeting with them.

The Clinton camp is saying that Obama is naive for his willingness to meet with rogue leaders. The Obama camp snorted back that Hillary Clinton would maintain the Bush status quo with regard to international diplomacy.

John Edwards, meanwhile, is demonstrating his self-serving nature by using this spat to his advantage. Edwards said:

If you’re looking for what’s wrong in Washington, why the system is broken, one perfect example is what’s been happening over the last four days. We’ve had two good people, Democratic candidates for president, who’ve spent their time attacking each other instead of attacking the problems facing our country.

Perhaps these DFLers should get back to their master plan for America: the confiscation of more wealth from hardworking Americans and complete pandering to terrorists, life-long welfare recipients, and convicted felons.

(Article)

The Pentagon has harshly criticized Hillary Clinton for helping the terrorists with her “abandon Iraq” public statements. From the MSNBC article:

Premature and public discussion of the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq reinforces enemy propaganda that the United States will abandon its allies in Iraq, much as we are perceived to have done in Vietnam, Lebanon and Somalia…

Well, that’s a no-brainer. Unless you are a liberal, in which case you don’t have much of a brain in the first place.

Also on the same page is a link to MSNBC video where Hillary Clinton demonstrates what a fraud she is with respect to her position on the Iraq War. In March, Hillary said she would pull troops out of Iraq. Then this month she said she would leave American troops behind in Iraq to train Iraqi security forces and help keep the peace.

Uh, which is it, Ms. Clinton? You can’t have it both ways! Democrats, being pathological frauds and liars, always play both sides of an issue. They need to appeal to their delusional and highly vocal liberal base while at the same time keeping one foot rooted in reality to avoid scaring off the portion of the Democratic base that has a modicum of common sense.

Hillary must have been taking lessons from her husband Bill Clinton on how to be two-faced. Perhaps Hillary should take some lessons from Monica Lewinsky. Maybe then Bill Clinton will actually stop by to see her for more than a photo opportunity.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are an idiot.

Bill and Hillary Clinton liquidated their blind trust in an effort to head off accusations of hypocrisy and criticism from their anti-capitalist liberal base. The trust, which was reported to be valued at between $5 million and $25 million (I bet the true value is on the high end), contained holdings in stocks of Big Oil, Wal-Mart, pharmaceuticals, and military contractors. All of these companies have been demonized by the Democratic Party, some by Hillary Clinton herself.

The real question is: will the Clintons disgorge themselves of all the profits they made from these investments? Hillary Clinton has publicly stated that she wants to confiscate the profits of Big Oil. Unless she gives away all those ill-gotten gains, she is a true hypocrite.

The Clintons have profited from high oil prices, high healthcare costs, the Iraq War, and low employee wages and benefits at Wal-Mart. They have profited from everything they claim to be against. There is no other honest thing for the Clintons to do but deny themselves the profits they made from these investments.

Perhaps the Clintons can give their millions in profit from these holdings to the poor they pretend to care so much about. Nah, they’ll never do that! These elitist DFLers like to live lives of wealth and luxury that they want to deny the rest of us the opportunity to enjoy.

The Clintons are among the dirtiest frauds and liars the world has ever known. How anybody can consider voting for this fraud Hillary Clinton is beyond me.

It was reported that disgraced former President Bill Clinton earned a whopping $10 million for doing very little work in 2006 (he gave speeches).

Mr. Clinton always pretended to care about the poor. But will he give all of his earnings to the poor he says he cares about, or will he use his money to live a lavish lifestyle? Here’s a guy with the financial means to help those he says he cares about. But will he? Nope.

Bill Clinton is many things: impeached former President, cheater, liar, perjurer, sexual harasser, sexual predator, alleged rapist and more. He’s also a hero to millions of liberal idiots. But one thing he isn’t is genuine. He isn’t a man of principles or conviction. Bill Clinton a shameless liar and a fraud.

Enjoy your limousines and caviar, Mr. Clinton. Don’t worry about the poor and homeless you pretend to care about suffering because you won’t help them with your millions of dollars.

While speaking to union members today, Hillary Clinton said:

If we don’t have a strong manufacturing base in our economy, it won’t be long until we don’t have a strong economy.

Great. But what does this imbecile think that her and her DFL comrades’ tax increases are going to do? Make manufacturing more rewarding?
To a business, taxes are an expense. Hillary Clinton and the other Democrats want to force businesses to provide health insurance to all workers and increase taxes on them. Income taxes, carbon taxes, it never ends with DFLers. The Democrats’ taxes erode profitability and reduce the return on investment from putting money toward productive activity, making it not worthwhile.

Does Hillary and her idiot DFL buddies think that people invest money in businesses so the Democrats can steal it all? Socialist Hillary wants to take things away from people, yet she thinks that people should invest in American manufacturing to make it easier for her to do so!

Pure Democrat stupidity!

Let’s give Hillary credit for one thing: she did truthfully admit that we have a strong economy. Usually these Democrats are perpetuating the lie that “our economy is in shambles”.

Worker wages and benefits are one reason that companies look to offshore labor. The Democrats’ high taxes and regulation are another reason jobs are leaving America. It is possible that this is the biggest reason.

The Democrats need to learn one important lesson: Nobody works and invests so the Democrats can take all their money away.

After years of reading “Bush lied” garbage in the newspaper, I finally saw an article about Hillary Clinton’s prior support for the Iraq War.

Ms. Clinton believed Saddam Hussein was a dangerous man and a threat with WMDs and nuclear weapons. Hillary supported war, she supported removing Saddam from power.

The liberal left likes to ignore such facts. They like to bash Bush, pretending as if he acted alone when we invaded Iraq and deposed Saddam Hussein. But the reality is that Bush couldn’t have done a thing without the support of Democrats like Ms. Clinton.

Will liberals call Hillary Clinton a “war monger”? Will they say that Hillary lied for oil? Probably not. The left will turn a blind eye to Hillary’s support for the war and their own values in the process, continuing to support someone who held the same positions as President Bush-whom they accuse of lying.

Video Of Hillary Clinton Defending Her Views Of Iraq Before Code Pink Group

Today, Hillary Clinton says she wants to pull the troops out of Iraq immediately. But does she? Or is she just pretending to want troop withdrawal because it’s what her audience wants to hear?

Everything about Hillary, from her career to her marriage to her public positions, is phony. Hillary doesn’t have a genuine bone in her flabby body.

The liberal left loves frauds.