Presumptive DFL presidential nominee Barack Obama is in Germany today to give a speech pandering to euro liberals.  According to news reports, Obama is very popular in Germany, with 74% of poll respondents saying they would vote for them if they could largely based on his youthfulness, John F. Kennedy-like charisma, and his skin color.

None of those are valid reasons to vote for someone to be the leader of the USA and the free world. That’s just pure idiocy from people who can’t think beyond a manufactured public image created by political consultants.

Obama’s speech will be focused on US-Europe relations.  Liberals have been pounding away on the theory that the image of the United States has been damaged in recent years by the actions of President George W. Bush.  For some irrational reason, lefties believe that liberating 25 million Iraqi civilians from that cruel and ruthless dictator Saddam Hussein was unjust.  So that is why Obama decided on this topic for his speech which, undoubtedly, was written by Obama’s hired speech writers.

Several weeks ago Ralph Nader said that Obama was capitalizing on white guilt.  One must wonder if white guilt is the reason Obama is so popular in Germany.  Remember, this is a nation that tried to exterminate the Jewish race.  What other possible reason could there be for Obama’s popularity with a foreign nation that can’t vote for him and likely is largely unaware of his true character and his associations (Tony Rezko, Jeremiah Wright, William “Bill” Ayers).

In the end, it doesn’t matter what Germans think, because they can’t vote in American elections.  And that’s a good thing, because this is the nation that put Adolf Hitler into power because of his charisma and public speaking prowess, the same basis as their support for Barack Obama. Germans were wrong once, and they are again.

It is really sickening the way the American media is drawing parallels between Obama and the German visits by JFK and Ronald Reagan. The difference between those two and Obama is that they were presidents at the times of their visits and they actually discussed issues of substance, not pap like Obama is doing.

A CNN article says that Justice Department officials discriminated against liberals and those with Democratic Party ties denying them from taking part in a program designed to funnel new lawyers into government jobs.

That sounds like a great way to weed out idiots to me.  If you are a liberal, your brain doesn’t function properly and we don’t want you.

Every business should do that.  Productivity and profits would soar.  I’m sure employee theft would decline markedly, too.  Who wants a company filled with whining pissants who want to steal every penny you’ve got?

Yes he did it.  Barack Obama has played the race card against the Republicans.  This is what Obama said:

We know what kind of campaign they’re going to run. They’re going to try to make you afraid.

They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?

Yes, Obama, you are inexperienced.  You are also a giant hypocrite who engages in everything he claims to be against from earmarks to grant requests for political contributors to crooked real estate deals.

It has nothing to do with you being black, Barack Hussein.  Our opposition to you is because you have no experience, you want to raise taxes and further block domestic oil drilling, you are weak on terrorists, and you have no track record to speak of other than your hypocritical behavior such as granting favors to contributors.  You are an absolute fraud.

Had people known more about Obama prior to his early victories in the primary season he would have never made it as far as he’s gotten.  The office of the presidency is the most important job in the world.  A relative  unknown like Obama with no experience is not suitable.

Barack Obama has character flaws so big you could drive a cement truck through them.  This is John McCain’s race to lose and if he doesn’t get out there and start criticizing Obama, he will lose.  Playing nice is not going to cut it when you’ve got the vast majority of the journalists and news media vigorously hyping your opponent. The news is nothing but a constant stream of pro-Obama propaganda.

At least Obama admitted that he is inexperienced. That’s one of the few truthful things that has ever come out of his mouth.

Don’t forget this crucial fact, Obama:  the Democratic Party is the party of slavery.  It’s true.  It was the Republican party that ended slavery.  The Democratic Party wanted slavery to continue.

Reuters article

Political journalists and Democratic Party bigwigs have been ratcheting up the pressure on Hillary Clinton to quit the race so their favored candidate, Barack Obama, can become the nominee. After this week’s votes in Indiana and North Carolina, Hillary trails Obama by 156 delegates, making it pretty much impossible for her to catch up without significant support from super delegates, which is becoming less likely with each passing day.

But why should Hillary quit? This has been her dream for years and the entire reason she put up with her husband’s cheating ways the past three decades. She’s been drawing a majority of the white vote. Given that whites still make up almost 70% of the population, that is definitely an advantage that her opponent does not have and something that will be critical come November.

Even hardened Conservatives like me who dislike Hillary with a passion feel that her desire to fight on makes her more worthy of respect than she otherwise would have been. We don’t like people who give up easily. We like people who struggle to overcome the obstacles, even if they fail in the process, and we give them credit for trying. Those are basic values that Conservatives appreciate, unlike Democrats who love it when people spend their entire lives on welfare.

Does that mean Conservatives will vote for Hillary? No. But, a lot of swing voters may come to her side because of the way she fights for what she believes in. Many may feel that a President who will be a fighter for “change” (a hollow concept) is just what this country needs. And she is clearly demonstrating that she is a fighter. Nobody can argue that.

Hillary definitely needs to draw more distinctions between herself and Obama. She should attack his character. Things like William Ayers, his wife’s $200,000 raise and the $1 million earmark Obama requested for her employer, his real estate deal with Tony Rezko, his $8,000 a month payments from Robert Blackwell Jr. for whom Obama wrote a letter requesting a grant, etcetera.

Obama is a highly flawed candidate. His character can easily be attacked, and it should be, for it is concrete proof of who he is as a person and who he will be as a leader. He is not a uniter. Nor is he an agent for change in Washington. He is another corrupt political hack on the take who has demonstrated that he is for sale to anyone willing to send some cash his way.

Keep fighting, Hillary. I won’t vote for you, but I do have more respect for you than I ever did. Quitters never win, and winners never quit.

Barack Obama released his 2007 tax return today which showed $4.2 million in income for 2007.

Obama, as you may know, has been preaching about the horrors of economic inequality. It looks like he’s very unequal, doesn’t it? Obama is just another lying Democrat fraud who tells us how to live while enjoying his money.

If Obama truly cared about economic justice, he’d begin by relieving himself of his wealth by giving it all away. Giving your own money away…how’s that for justice, Obama?

You want to know what else is interesting? Obama’s wealth is the result of his political career. His career in politics turned him into a celebrity which enabled him to become rich. Without politics, he’d still be chugging away in an office somewhere as a lawyer.

I guess politics can be very rewarding financially if you can find a way to appeal to Democrat voting idiots.

AP Article

I took a look at Hillary Clinton’s official website today… Wow, you could spend a lifetime pointing out the idiocy of this woman’s positions. Let’s look at some of them for a minute and reveal just what a fraud and idiot this woman is, OK?

http://hillaryclinton.com/issues/middleclass/

First up is this little bit:

Income inequality has risen to the highest levels since 1929…

Hillary Clinton has $50 million! She and her husband have earned $109 million in seven years! Who the hell is she to complain about income inequality when she represents that inequality herself? And if she doesn’t like money, why doesn’t she give her money away?

Lowering taxes for middle class families

Lowering taxes? The tax burden in the United States is already severely skewed toward the upper income bracket. Her goal isn’t to reduce taxes, it’s to redistribute wealth from the upper bracket to the lower brackets so she can buy votes.

Providing quality, affordable health care to every American

What a meaningless bit of drivel that is. This is a woman who has fought against tort reform, which would make it more difficult for trial lawyers, who are big financial backers of the Democratic Party, to file frivolous lawsuits against people. In many areas of the country, average malpractice insurance premiums for Obstetricians exceed $100,000 per year. Who pays the cost of that insurance? The patients and the health insurers, do. Would tort reform reduce frivolous lawsuits and thus reduce the cost of malpractice insurance? Absolutely it would.

Making college accessible and affordable

The fact is that the most liberal institutions of higher learning in this country have the highest tuition. More liberal, higher cost. And we are to believe that a liberal like Hillary Clinton is going to make college affordable?

Bolstering retirement security by promoting savings and investment

How stupid does this woman think we are? She promises to raise taxes! Taxes erode the return from savings and investment and actually discourage them. Why would anyone put their money at risk if the bulk of it is taxed away?

Returning to fiscal responsibility and moving towards balanced budgets

That’s hillarious! Hillary Clinton has proposed hundreds of billions in new spending. How is she going to pay for it? Raising taxes will reduce economic activity, which in turn reduces tax collections. Every time Hillary opens her mouth she proposes new spending. And we are to believe she is going to move toward a balanced budget?

Harnessing innovation to create the high-wage jobs of the 21st century

Again, high taxes reduce investment and thus reduce innovation. Even a Democrat voter should be able to make that connection.

Unbelievable. Every one of Hillary Clinton’s ideas will do more to harm the middle class than to help it.

The idiocy of the Democratic Party never ends!

At a time when oil has reached a record price, just under $110 per barrel, Democrats in the House Natural Resources Committee passed a bill to permanently ban oil drilling off the coast of Sonoma and Marin Counties in California.

According to this article, oil companies have long wanted to get at the oil offshore. The Democrat plan would double size the of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank national marine sanctuaries, preventing access to the liquid gold beneath the ocean floor.

Now, unless you are a total and complete idiot, in other words, a Democrat, you know that the Democratic Party has been blocking domestic oil drilling for years.

In all the years from 2001 to 2006, Democrats have blocked oil drilling in Alaska, and more recently they have blocked oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

Most Democrat voters are either not smart enough to care about this or are unwilling to look beyond their hand which is extended for more welfare freebies. The Democratic Party’s policy of blocking domestic oil drilling is raising the cost of everything they buy, harming productivity, and costing them a fortune at the pump.

But those Democrats just aren’t smart enough to see it, are they?