A California state lawmaker has proposed a law requiring climate change to be taught in schools. This strategy is designed to indoctrinate the young before their brains have fully developed and scare them into believing something that isn’t true.

The problem with global warming is that the science is not there to suggest it is the result of man. How is it possible to precisely measure the temperature of the environment to within 1/100th of a degree at each of the trillions of different data points in the earth’s atmosphere? It isn’t. Global warming theories are the result of models. But the world does not operate according to models. The world is much too dynamic and too random to be described by models created by liberals.

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8269190

The last couple of weeks have seen an increase in pro Barack Hussein Obama propaganda in the media. The message the left-wingers are sending is that Barack Hussein is going to capture votes from Republicans because of his message.

No, he will not. Barack Obama’s message is hollow. There is nothing there. He is a thinly veiled Martin Luther King Jr. wannabe and we Conservatives can see right through it.

Obama has not said a single thing of substance this entire campaign. He has no real experience in an executive position. He has articulated no concrete ideas other than his socialist agenda of more wealth redistribution and welfare entitlements.

Sorry, Democrats, we Conservatives are not stupid. Compare the academic achievement in our communities versus yours. We can see Barack Obama for the non-substantive, inexperienced wannabe that he is. We Conservatives do not vote based on looks or charisma. We do not vote based on “positive messages” that are not based in reality.

It is you left-wingers who do that. That is why you elected a serial rapist like Bill Clinton to the Presidency twice and why you continue to idolize him to this day.

Just the fact that a man like Barack Hussein Obama with no real experience and no concrete plans can capture the backing of so many prominent Democrats and their voters speaks volumes about the intellect of Democrats. Or, should I say, the lack of intellect.