Hillary Clinton Leads; Why Is John Edwards Even Running?
As most people expected, Hillary Clinton leads the Democratic field for the 2008 presidential nomination. This is according to a Washington Post poll taken from May 29th to June 1st. The numbers:
| Candidate | % Support |
|---|---|
| Hillary Clinton | 42 |
| Barack Obama | 27 |
| John Edwards | 11 |
Clearly, John Edwards is getting his butt kicked in the race. This is despite tons of free publicity as a result of his wife’s cancer announcement a couple of months ago. Given that he was the 2004 Vice Presidential nominee, things are not looking good for Edwards. He has dropped 6% since the April poll.
So why is Edwards even running with numbers this bad? Is it so he can bill $400 haircuts to his campaign instead of paying for them out of his own pocket?
We wouldn’t expect a multi-millionaire, ambulance-chaser lawyer like Edwards to use his own money for personal grooming expenses, would we? ![]()
Maybe Edwards should drop out of the race and go back to giving speeches about poverty to poor college kids at $55,000 a pop? These Democrats are such frauds! ![]()
As for Al Gore, this poll seems to dash the hopes of the radical Environmentalists; Gore would have only 17% support to Clinton’s 35% if he joined the race.

June 5th, 2007 at 9:14 am
You are a moron. National numbers are meaningless this far out and Edwards is doing quite well in the early states that will drive the primary fight.
June 5th, 2007 at 1:32 pm
Edwards is toast. Come on, Barack Obama has a huge lead over him. Obama has hardly any political experience and has no concrete platform, unless you call flowery speeches full of nothing a platform. A former VP nominee should be doing better nationally, even this far out.